Also a note for everyone in Colorado. When arguing with everyone supporting 127 the only real argument they have is on Bobcats and Trapping. They focus on the unlimited take aspects, and the idea that it is only for fur despite the fact that people actually eat them.
If Colorado survives this measure, the first thing that should happen is the public hunters should push for new regulations that address those 2 issues. The easy one to solve is simply make people harvest the bobcat meat. It is great meat. Way better than say nasty duck or goose. It could make good sausage, jerky, etc. It is also good in soups, stews, green chili etc. A very low hanging and easy fruit to fix for the cat issue.
The other issue is to address the idea of unlimited take. Since most cats are live trapped you could address this by allowing only so many females to be taken by any one person during the season. Like an individual quota, or you could allow each person up to 10 bobcats per month for the season so an individual may take up to 30 a year? Then you can say there is limit and the CPW manager can adjust that limit based on population goals etc.
If you resolve those 2 issues then the anti hunters arguments fall apart.