I’m really liking Nilllers approach to this—I want scopes to come off because I want the muzzy hunt to be very different than the any legal weapon hunt. Currently it is not.
Variety is the spice of life and having a hunt that forces folks to develop a new set of differing skills is cool. One that is based in history and harkens back to the settlement of this great country is a neat idea. There is an appeal to that.
If you want to "harken" back to the settlement of this great country nobody, and I mean literally nobody is stopping you.
Why force people to hunt the way you want to.
A muzzleloader even the new ones are still a far cry from being on the same level as a centerfire rifle. Even a single shot rifle like everyone compares them too.
There are a litany of variables that go into getting a muzzleloader to not only shoot well, but consistently. You can't just throw your bullets in the gun, take 5-10 shots to sight it in and then go out and hunt with it.
This is especially true for the guys shooting longer ranges, they have to get the right bullets, they may have to size the bullets to there barrel, use the right powder, weigh each load of powder perfectly, take the time to shoot these loads, then go out and test them to the gun to find what is working best. Then there is the added pressure when loading the gun especially during a hunting situation, got to make sure your barrel stays dry, and your primers stay dry.
There are multiple things that go into muzzleloader hunting that makes it way different and more difficult than the rifle hunts.
All you guys saying that are truly being disingenuous, as most of you are muzzleloader hunters so you know all this.
this is where I come down on this, are the guns better then they we're 10 years ago? Absolutely does a scope make shots easier yes it does, but does the harvest data compiled over the last 20+ years show that adding scopes 7 years ago made a significant difference? It does not, not on the general deer hunts that are probably the fairest comparison to make.
I fully support the tech committee getting together to ensure that future and new emerging technologies are being reviewed to see if they fit into the vision, scope, merits and standards of fair chase that the hunting community demands. But the direction they are going with this issue does not meet that criteria in my opinion.
And I still believe this is a slippery slope that we need to be careful on, they take scopes from muzzys today, what are they going to be looking at tomorrow. I know the wildlife board has final say in these issues, but the committee can drum up whatever they want to present to them and slam has already pointed out this is a new long standing committee that is not going away after this issue.