Ultimag
Active Member
- Messages
- 698
How do you figure that?The difference is that most of the killed elk would not be found. They would just go off and die with an arrow or ball in the guts.
How do you figure that?The difference is that most of the killed elk would not be found. They would just go off and die with an arrow or ball in the guts.
Within their maximum effective ranges a recurve (40 yds) and a flintlock (120 yds) are just as deadly as a high powered rifle at 500 yards. North America was mostly tamed by flintlocks, to say they inherently wound more is ridiculous. Any weapon has a higher probability to wound beyond it's proscribed range. That wham bam .338 mega magnum is gonna wound at 1,500 yards just like the flintlock would at 250 yards.@Ultimag
Pretty simple really. If you make people use a less lethal weapon, Such as muzzleloaders with round ball ammo or recurve bows, you will inherently have more wounding loss. Multiply that with today's #sendit mentality and there will no doubt be a much higher wounding loss.
Round balls are terrible I would rather use arrowsWithin their maximum effective ranges a recurve (40 yds) and a flintlock (120 yds) are just as deadly as a high powered rifle at 500 yards. North America was mostly tamed by flintlocks, to say they inherently wound more is ridiculous. Any weapon has a higher probability to wound beyond it's proscribed range. That wham bam .338 mega magnum is gonna wound at 1,500 yards just like the flintlock would at 250 yards.
If the #sendit mentality exists with mega magnums then they are wounding critters just the same as any other weapon system.
There are a lot of valid arguments against flintlocks but them being wounding machines is BS
The main valid argument for the status quo is that folks just really like their high powered rifles and want to use em--that's great but the trade off is your gonna hunt a lot less.
Long ranger #sendit shooters wound more than their fair share. You just don't hear about it. They only post the neck shots and gut shot follow ups.Within their maximum effective ranges a recurve (40 yds) and a flintlock (120 yds) are just as deadly as a high powered rifle at 500 yards. North America was mostly tamed by flintlocks, to say they inherently wound more is ridiculous. Any weapon has a higher probability to wound beyond it's proscribed range. That wham bam .338 mega magnum is gonna wound at 1,500 yards just like the flintlock would at 250 yards.
If the #sendit mentality exists with mega magnums then they are wounding critters just the same as any other weapon system.
There are a lot of valid arguments against flintlocks but them being wounding machines is BS
The main valid argument for the status quo is that folks just really like their high powered rifles and want to use em--that's great but the trade off is your gonna hunt a lot less.
You discount the Massive revenue forcing all NR to buy a worthless hunting license and all those bonus points they sell. A HUGE cash cow they would lose. Never going to happen to get rid of that Golden Goose……
Your wrong so we will agree to disagreeLong ranger #sendit shooters wound more than their fair share. You just don't hear about it. They only post the neck shots and gut shot follow ups.
I'll stand by my round ball and recurves wound more critters than bore-drivers and compounds.
Same asi said to elk antlers we will ageee to disagreeNR are irrelevant in all states period. You all are dreaming if you think otherwise.
Studies show traditional archery equipment have a high rate, more than 50% of all deer shot with archery equipment are wounded and never recovered. The good news is 73 % of those wounded survive. An interesting study, many studies show similar rates. Going to an all traditional archery elk hunt would certainly drastically decrease the harvest rate but would likely leave some animals to die and not be recovered. http://wp.auburn.edu/deerlab/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/581998-SEAFWA.pdfYour wrong so we will agree to disagree
You'reYour wrong so we will agree to disagree
Especially since i couldn’t tell you how many times I’ve asked someone if they got their deer they say “no, but i hit a good one”.Studies show traditional archery equipment have a high rate, more than 50% of all deer shot with archery equipment are wounded and never recovered. The good news is 73 % of those wounded survive. An interesting study, many studies show similar rates. Going to an all traditional archery elk hunt would certainly drastically decrease the harvest rate but would likely leave some animals to die and not be recovered. http://wp.auburn.edu/deerlab/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/581998-SEAFWA.pdf
Ive had guys, tell me the same, thing after shooting them with a, 300 rum, don't blame the weapon for bad shootingEspecially since i couldn’t tell you how many times I’ve asked someone if they got their deer they say “no, but i hit a good one”.
Comma #senditIve had guys, tell me the same, thing after shooting them with a, 300 rum, don't blame the weapon for bad shooting