Cam@strawberry
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 2,365
I get what you are saying here nilla. Not sure I agree with it, however, I’m definitely not prepared to argue against it.I just want to focus on this last part to illustrate why I disagree. When the DWR is the on rigging the system so this lobby for “quality” continues to remain powerful and stamp out any effort to opposition is corruption. It’s the very definition of corruption.
You take from those you are saying are under-represented and underfunded and give the money to those on the other side, in a way that violated their own rules to boot, and that is corruption.
In fact, I’d be interested to see if what SFW does in its lobbying efforts for wildlife regulations are a violation of the Hatch Act. That’s an interesting rabbit hole someone should go down…
So berrysblaster, I get what you’re saying in trying to focus on fixing the issue, but if we’re starting from the position that what SFW and the DWR have done here is above board and not corruption, then you’ve lost me.
I view corruption through the lens of legality. Nothing that SFW or the DWR has done or is doing is illegal, so therefore I don’t see it as corrupt. Unfair? Probably.
There’s so many levels and layers to this problem it’s almost irresponsible to blanket assess it in 4-5 paragraphs typed on a phone.
I believe the pendulum is beginning to shift, some of the guys who propped up the system for the last decade are seeing its shortcomings and money is shifting purposes. The antelope island deer tag sale on Friday is a glaring example, and while I won’t elaborate on what happened with it, it sent a very clear message to the powers that be, that there are people in the state in places that can make change that are fed up. Hope it continues.