Trump Verdict

TKMulePacker said:
Biden should pardon Trump, he might find himself on the other end of all this pretty soon. Trump is grade A NYC real estate scum, pretty much everything republicans hated until he took up their flag (overwhelming Irony).

BUT, despite trump being a complete dumpster fire of a human and a life long mob boss wannabe, this is not the way. Pardon him.

Our political system is rapidly devolving into something more closely resembling a former soviet bloc country. The earth isnt round or flat, its F#cked.
Click to expand...

You are right. He's everything the check pants, bow tie, Mitt Romney crowd hate. Republicans were to lose with dignity, give speeches about Reagan, but always, always, keep giving ground.

22,000 gun laws, but pro 2A. 60 million abortions, but anti abortion. 20 million illegals, but pro border control. "Traditional family values", but pride month, genital mutilation surgery. America first as China explodes onto the stage.

That's the Republican party that conservatives had shoved down their throat.

Just keep nominating Bob Dole, John McCain, Mitt Romney.

Meanwhile the Dems will ELECT street fighters like the Clinton Machine, and Chicago crew.

But by golly, "Reagan, Reagan, Reagan".

It's a "dumpster fire" because the Conservatives decided to resort to the Dems version of politics. Dirty, nasty, ugly, mean

If the R would just get back in line, nominate a Bush, or Romney, all would be well.🙄
 
feddoc said:
Where is the outrage w/ Clinton?

rumble.com

The Bill Clinton "hush money" video Democrats don't want you to share

It would be a shame if this went viral. New rules.
rumble.com rumble.com
Click to expand...
Exactly, under the table Bill paid $800,000+.

My bigger beef is with Killary. She paid for a fake dossier using campaign funds to interfere with an election. That dossier was a made up lie to try and change an election….that should be a no brainer conviction. Same with the 51 “intelligence” officers who signed the letter saying the dossier is real. All of them should be charged as well.

This whole system is rigged and how any self respecting democrat can actually still vote for these idiots is beyond me.
 
hossblur said:
You are right. He's everything the check pants, bow tie, Mitt Romney crowd hate. Republicans were to lose with dignity, give speeches about Reagan, but always, always, keep giving ground.

22,000 gun laws, but pro 2A. 60 million abortions, but anti abortion. 20 million illegals, but pro border control. "Traditional family values", but pride month, genital mutilation surgery. America first as China explodes onto the stage.

That's the Republican party that conservatives had shoved down their throat.

Just keep nominating Bob Dole, John McCain, Mitt Romney.

Meanwhile the Dems will ELECT street fighters like the Clinton Machine, and Chicago crew.

But by golly, "Reagan, Reagan, Reagan".

It's a "dumpster fire" because the Conservatives decided to resort to the Dems version of politics. Dirty, nasty, ugly, mean

If the R would just get back in line, nominate a Bush, or Romney, all would be well.🙄
Click to expand...
It’s why I was saying it’s time to fight just like the dems. The only way to stop a wolf is with another wolf, or sss.

I won’t be voting for any republican going forward unless they are willing to take off the gloves. Once again, every red state attorney and AG should be bringing charges against Dems.
 
Flyjunky12 said:
Exactly, under the table Bill paid $800,000+.

My bigger beef is with Killary. She paid for a fake dossier using campaign funds to interfere with an election. That dossier was a made up lie to try and change an election….that should be a no brainer conviction. Same with the 51 “intelligence” officers who signed the letter saying the dossier is real. All of them should be charged as well.

This whole system is rigged and how any self respecting democrat can actually still vote for these idiots is beyond me.
Click to expand...
Classic what-aboutism.... :rolleyes:

Some smart Republicans should investigate and charge Bill and his old hag if there is evidence that a jury of 12 would convict on. ;)
 
azhunteraz said:
Classic what-aboutism.... :rolleyes:

Some smart Republicans should investigate and charge Bill and his old hag if there is evidence that a jury of 12 would convict on. ;)
Click to expand...

Ever notice it's always the R that get accused of what aboutism?

It's almost as if, the libs have already done it all?

We'd like to get charged.

But despite being guilty of holding and moving classified documents, "a well meaning elderly man with memory problems" is so sad, a jury would feel bad for him.


Or

The FBI director will spend 10 min, laying out Hillary's classified crimes, but

"No reasonable prosecutor" would ever bring charges against her, in 96% democrat DC.

As we know, the FBI director, is often confused with the AG.

But of course that AG, would rather take contempt charges, than prosecute Obama for running guns into Mexico.

The whataboutism is strong, I agree.
 
azhunteraz said:
Classic what-aboutism.... :rolleyes:

Some smart Republicans should investigate and charge Bill and his old hag if there is evidence that a jury of 12 would convict on. ;)
Click to expand...
You’re fking hilarious.

How is it what-aboutism when there are laws in this country that should be followed and applied equally?

Problem is that Dems would cry like little babies, saying how it’s so unfair if the law was actually applied equally.
 
hossblur said:
Ever notice it's always the R that get accused of what aboutism?

It's almost as if, the libs have already done it all?

We'd like to get charged.

But despite being guilty of holding and moving classified documents, "a well meaning elderly man with memory problems" is so sad, a jury would feel bad for him.


Or

The FBI director will spend 10 min, laying out Hillary's classified crimes, but

"No reasonable prosecutor" would ever bring charges against her, in 96% democrat DC.

As we know, the FBI director, is often confused with the AG.

But of course that AG, would rather take contempt charges, than prosecute Obama for running guns into Mexico.

The whataboutism is strong, I agree.
Click to expand...
Did you see the excuse the white house came up with for not releasing the tapes from the Hur interview?

They were afraid someone could use Biden’s voice in a deep fake AI scenario for nefarious purposes…waj. More like they don’t want the world to see how stupid and incompetent Biden is.
 
Shocker, if you question the verdict and Alan Bragg you are now a racist.

Wow, couldn’t have predicted that from the dems! In any commentary I’ve seen not once has race been even remotely hinted at. Just like always when the dems can’t defend their actions…..IT’s RACISM

What a bunch of losers
 
Flyjunky12 said:
My bigger beef is with Killary. She paid for a fake dossier using campaign funds to interfere with an election. That dossier was a made up lie to try and change an election….that should be a no brainer conviction.
Click to expand...
Then why is she not being charged? It's not to late!
 
This attorney from CA has an idea. Equal justice under the law.

Screen Shot 2024-06-03 at 11.09.00 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-06-03 at 11.09.30 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-06-03 at 11.09.50 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-06-03 at 11.10.40 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-06-03 at 11.11.40 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-06-03 at 11.12.22 AM.png
Screen Shot 2024-06-03 at 11.12.51 AM.png
 
What state she would get charged is above my pay grade. I'm just pointing out there are ample opportunities to throw spit balls at these people to see what would stick yet they continue to just biche and moan about it or have a congressional hearing.

I live in Colorado. As demonstrated here, the liberal way is through the courts especially if conservatives are involved in some fashion. They want you to expel time, money, or other resources all at the mercy of a court keeping whatever they don't want from advancing.
 
tailchasers said:
What state she would get charged is above my pay grade. I'm just pointing out there are ample opportunities to throw spit balls at these people to see what would stick yet they continue to just biche and moan about it or have a congressional hearing.

I live in Colorado. As demonstrated here, the liberal way is through the courts especially if conservatives are involved in some fashion. They want you to expel time, money, or other resources all at the mercy of a court keeping whatever they don't want from advancing.
Click to expand...

Point is, lib court, lib prosecutors, won't happen there.
 
www.foxnews.com

Some former 'Never Trump' voters now say they're backing GOP nominee after his conviction

Several voters spoke with The Free Press about how the recent conviction of former President Trump is motivating them to support him in the upcoming election.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com


Shaun Maguire, a Los Angeles-based venture capitalist and a former Hillary Clinton campaign donor, declared on social media that he donated $300,000 to the Trump campaign within an hour of the verdict, and wrote in an essay that "the double standards and lawfare that Trump has faced" "boiled my blood."

He told The Free Press, "We were told that Donald Trump would be the end of democracy, but it turns out that lawfare tactics have been escalated by the Democrats and not by the Republicans. And so it’s from that backdrop that I believe the Republican Party is less of a danger to democracy than the Democratic Party right now."
 
feddoc said:
www.foxnews.com

Some former 'Never Trump' voters now say they're backing GOP nominee after his conviction

Several voters spoke with The Free Press about how the recent conviction of former President Trump is motivating them to support him in the upcoming election.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com


Shaun Maguire, a Los Angeles-based venture capitalist and a former Hillary Clinton campaign donor, declared on social media that he donated $300,000 to the Trump campaign within an hour of the verdict, and wrote in an essay that "the double standards and lawfare that Trump has faced" "boiled my blood."

He told The Free Press, "We were told that Donald Trump would be the end of democracy, but it turns out that lawfare tactics have been escalated by the Democrats and not by the Republicans. And so it’s from that backdrop that I believe the Republican Party is less of a danger to democracy than the Democratic Party right now."
Click to expand...
Seems they are but a few big names who are moving to Trump after the trial.
 
Most of us here are preaching to the choir......the few others here are our enemy.......anyone that thinks this was a "normal" justice thing can stand on the side of the road with a broke down car till hell freezes over....no help from me....You don't exist....

You on that team aren't deep enough to understand the gravity of what just happened.....
 
Well it seems the Judge in Trump's trial has notified Trump's defense team that there may be "jury misconduct". It seems that a cousin of a jury member used a web site to state that his cousin was a jury member and long before the trial was completed the jury member advised his cousin that "Trump was guilty".
If proven to be true, that would overturn the verdict and require a new trial. It seems that jury member lied during the questions asked if he could be impartial and judge the case by the facts presented in the trial. Any bets he was a registered Democrat?
RELH
 
MrRogers said:
The whole jury from NY were registered Democrats. I’d bet $100
Click to expand...
So what. You get a jury of your peers, not political duplicates. Until a few years ago, Trump was a registered Democrat in Manhattan too.

PS. I'm sure Biden's jury had plenty of Democrats on it too.
 
Classifying a hush money payment as a business expense (to influence an election)..... or more specifically, the charges were for "falsification of business records".

Yup, nothing inherently illegal about banging a porn star and then paying her to stay quiet (I don't care about that, it's just a morality thing)..... but it's not a business expense. And it certainly appears to have been done to avoid negative publicity just prior to an election.....some have called that election interference.

Yup, not quite as significant as the classified docs case or the Georgia and federal election subversion cases. I'd much rather seen those cases tried than this one.
 
Last edited:
Trump's attorney made the payments to her without telling Trump according to Attorney Cohen. Cohen then billed Trump who paid the bill and that is considered a business expense. Main reason why the feds would not take on the case against Trump.
RELH
 
RELH said:
Trump's attorney made the payments to her without telling Trump according to Attorney Cohen. Cohen then billed Trump who paid the bill and that is considered a business expense. Main reason why the feds would not take on the case against Trump.
RELH
Click to expand...
Sure they did.

Cohen was known for doing super nice things for people like taking out home equity loans to fund a $130,000 payment to pay off his boses f*** buddy.

Oh yeah, and Cohen took out that $130K without even checking with the boss to make sure he'd get paid back?......right.

That's funny.
 
Last edited:
Your opinion, and that is all you have, is not worth a hill of beans in a court of law. The case will be overturned, but the deceitful Democrats got what they wanted to interfere with the upcoming election. Only problem their deceit was so apparent that it is backfiring with the voting citizens. They may have just assured Trump being elected again over your idol, sleepy Joe.
My neighbor plans to fly his F##K Biden flag again this coming Nov.
RELH
 
RELH said:
Well it seems the Judge in Trump's trial has notified Trump's defense team that there may be "jury misconduct". It seems that a cousin of a jury member used a web site to state that his cousin was a jury member and long before the trial was completed the jury member advised his cousin that "Trump was guilty".
If proven to be true, that would overturn the verdict and require a new trial. It seems that jury member lied during the questions asked if he could be impartial and judge the case by the facts presented in the trial. Any bets he was a registered Democrat?
RELH
Click to expand...
Oh....did that Facebook prank about jury misconduct go somewhere? I must have missed that.

Edit: And good for your neighbor.....I've never felt the need to brag about the flag my neighbor flew in their yard???? You should probably fly the same flag, or would you rather just brag about your neighbor?
 
Last edited:
You think I'd leave this site if Trump got elected? I might even post more often.
I really don't think you earned all of that supposed 130 IQ.
 
I'm totally good. I get a good dose of my daily comedy by visiting this site. Sometimes I even feel like commenting.

You OK? Don't know that I've ever seen you post anything intelligent. Usually pretty basic 1 or 2 liners with no substance. There was that one time you posted something you thought was funny on 3 separate threads.
 
NMFROM81 said:
I'm totally good. I get a good dose of my daily comedy by visiting this site. Sometimes I even feel like commenting.

You OK? Don't know that I've ever seen you post anything intelligent. Usually pretty basic 1 or 2 liners with no substance. There was that one time you posted something you thought was funny on 3 separate threads.
Click to expand...
Whew. Just making sure man.
 
NMFROM81 it is not worth the effort or time conversing with low I.Q. idiots. I am going to do what some others have done with you, click on the ignore button.
RELH
 
NMFROM81 said:
Classifying a hush money payment as a business expense (to influence an election)..... or more specifically, the charges were for "falsification of business records".

Yup, nothing inherently illegal about banging a porn star and then paying her to stay quiet (I don't care about that, it's just a morality thing)..... but it's not a business expense. And it certainly appears to have been done to avoid negative publicity just prior to an election.....some have called that election interference.

Yup, not quite as significant as the classified docs case or the Georgia and federal election subversion cases. I'd much rather seen those cases tried than this one.
Click to expand...

So.

He was supposed to use campaign funds for hush money, or, was supposed to put in his accounting software, "banging Stormy"?

Interesting how all the sudden, Hush money is a campaign violation.

Honestly, I assumed he banged her.

After the trial, I'm leaning more towards extortion.
 
hossblur said:
So.

He was supposed to use campaign funds for hush money, or, was supposed to put in his accounting software, "banging Stormy"?

Interesting how all the sudden, Hush money is a campaign violation.

Honestly, I assumed he banged her.

After the trial, I'm leaning more towards extortion.
Click to expand...
It was extortion.
She got paid to sign the NDA. Then violated it. It is not a crime to pay somone to sign a NDA. Just ask congress. They have a slush, or should I say Hush Money Fund fto pay off claims of sexual harassment. Wether true or false acustaiotns Congress has a Hush Money Fund.

But the trial was about falsifying business records. To influence a Federal election.🤔

Didn't Hilary pay for the Steele Dossier? Falsly claim it was a legal expense? She was fined by the Federal Election regulators with a campaign fiance viloation for flasifying business records in order to influence the 2016 election. Sound familiar? Why was this not felonious?

What about the 51 former intelligence officials? One could surmise that their intent was to influence the 2020 elections. By lying about the Hunter Biden Laptop from Hell? Was this felonious?

FJB :mad: LGB​
 
Cali4x4 said:
It was extortion.
She got paid to sign the NDA. Then violated it. It is not a crime to pay somone to sign a NDA. Just ask congress. They have a slush, or should I say Hush Money Fund fto pay off claims of sexual harassment. Wether true or false acustaiotns Congress has a Hush Money Fund.

But the trial was about falsifying business records. To influence a Federal election.🤔

Didn't Hilary pay for the Steele Dossier? Falsly claim it was a legal expense? She was fined by the Federal Election regulators with a campaign fiance viloation for flasifying business records in order to influence the 2016 election. Sound familiar? Why was this not felonious?

What about the 51 former intelligence officials? One could surmise that their intent was to influence the 2020 elections. By lying about the Hunter Biden Laptop from Hell? Was this felonious?

FJB :mad: LGB​
Click to expand...
Don’t forget ‘Ol FJB lied about doing business with his son and also saying the laptop from hell was Russian disinformation….he said that during the debate for all the world to hear, straight up election interference by our “President”.
 

Similar threads

joesikora
F1
Replies
2
Views
1k
BeanMan
BeanMan

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos

Member Gallery Photos and Videos!

1713404228813.jpeg
IMG_9410.JPG
C04C774D-4FC8-4252-9858-C03B23735552.jpeg
99 buck.jpg
Screenshot_20230717_101726_Gallery.jpg
8D0C994F-667B-4663-9149-855A97B69B3E.jpeg
IMG_20131207_124723-1.jpg
Staci Buck.jpg
127876F7-9F34-49B1-A818-C48F4A6FD98B.jpeg
Good Looking Trophy Mount
Mr Handsome 004.JPG
7F008739-6254-447B-A993-7FACDE81AE74.jpeg
Back
Top Bottom