Here's what you are missing dude, if McCain and/or another candidate 'leaks' a story it is DIFFERENT than a supposed NEWSPAPER 'leaking' a story that has NO proof, no wrong doing, but does exactly what they hope, and that is for pinheads like you to take it as gospel. Journalists are supposed to be neutral, do you know what that means? It means they don't do the dirty work of one party or the dirty work of a candidate. Spin this all you want, but what the NYT has done is taking tabloid journalism to a new low, which is saying something. The funny thing is folks like you and cornhusker and others truly believe the NYT is 'mainstream' and not an agenda driven PR tool for ONE party. Say what you want about Fox, but they have nowhere near the audience of the NYT. And the other 'mainstream' media outlets are running with this as if it is in indictment of McCain. Thank God for the internet, cable news, and talk radio, or we would be all in the dark on what is going on. And no, I don't believe everything out there, but it is good to know the truth is out there if you are willing to look for it. I heard a NBC 'news' anchor say, "where there is smoke there is fire", implying that McCain is 'shady'. Funny how the only 'smoke' I see is coming from the editors office at the NYT, and dudes arse!
PRO
Define, develop, and sustain BOTH trophy and opportunity hunts throughout the state of Utah.