Is the King back?
- Thread starter SureShot
- Start date
coloradoman
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 2,110
So post the video?
youngstock14
Member
- Messages
- 39
tailchasers
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 5,306
nripepi
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 2,111
This is what he says: "This buck has been king years ago for me before anyone found the buck “King” on the range."
coloradoman
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 2,110
Still a stud Buck!
257Tony
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 4,173
Yep, he knew exactly what he was doing with that video title.
BrowningRage
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 4,446
I like Matt's videos. Pretty authentic guy on the mountain I think. Stud buck, but as has been mentioned, its not THAT King...
Wyo_Roadhunter
Active Member
- Messages
- 720
Definitely a big buck but the title got the clicks.
Homer
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 14,223
F&^%K I hate whispering gingers.......
elkassassin
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 37,032
yoteduster
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,884
He's a stud buck alright... I suppose now there'll be a army of people harassing him all winter now that he's been shown on the net
liecabucks
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,182
Well, if I remember right, he’ll sell you his secrets to success via personal phone call. The dude has killed some great bucks over the years but I think social media helped pull the trigger on a couple 140 bucks this year. Everyone needs a few “likes” I suppose.
Deerlove
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 6,023
That's what I hate about social media got to kill anything
Ticks N Tines
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,647
There's been a bunch of "KING is BACK" videos of bucks that are absolutely NOT the King. Click bait, or dumb people that think any big buck is now "The KING".
It's Cool seeing any nice bucks that survived the WY winter last year, but can we please stop calling them all "KING"?
It's Cool seeing any nice bucks that survived the WY winter last year, but can we please stop calling them all "KING"?
elkhunterUT
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 2,862
liecabucks
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,182
Didn't even kill one this whole year and believe it or not, I still won…I never kill big bucks so I am held to a very low standard so I win nearly every season.
JakeSwensen
Active Member
- Messages
- 666
JakeH
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 4,286
After looking over his sheds from the last 3 years I would say probably 7. That first set was just too big for him to have only been a 3 year old at the time, but not unheard of.
Is what was crazy was his dropper on the first year set was just a little bump, crazy what it turned into the next year.
SS!
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 9,136
Definitely makes sense. I could agree with it.
Saw a 240 buck get lab aged at 5. Makes a guy wonder how big of a genetic freaks those monster bucks are.
SS!
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 9,136
I would say it’s fairly accurate and would question guys who said they sent off two and received different ages. But like everything I’m sure there is a % of error.
yotebuster17
Active Member
- Messages
- 862
They claim that they are accurate on a population level but not on an individual level, meaning that if you age 100 deer your going to get good data on average but there are going to be some outliers so if you have one deer that you absolutely need to know the age of you can’t take it as gospel. A good friend of mine has all the deer and elk aged off their ranch and they get one now and then that they have plenty of history with (sheds etc) and it’ll come back as 2.5 yrs old or vice versa. The actual mechanics of what they are doing when they cut and dye those teeth doesn’t take into account trauma or injury to the teeth so it’s gonna have some total outliers.
