just_a_hunter
Active Member
- Messages
- 510
There were definitely mistakes on the ladies and her husbands side, but Aram ain’t no kind of man at all…
Todd
Todd
Completely agree. He should have stopped his own pursuit and helped her...or at minimum just left to go hunt a deer someone had not already shot. What a cluster...not a deer in the world I'm going to do any of the BS this clown Aram did. I'm betting about right now he wishes he had just tipped his cap to this lady and congratulated her on a fine buck.What kind of man or sportsman doesn’t do everything he can to have that woman shoot and kill that buck?
I'm betting about right now he wishes he had just tipped his cap to this lady and congratulated her on a fine buck.
I’ve read a fair amount of his stuff over the years, I’d profile him as a dude who is concerned about being right, not so much about doing the right thing.Doubtful. Doesn’t seem like the type that would care enough to feel any regrets.
On the flipside how was he supposed to know? I am sitting there looking for my target buck... I hear some shots, then the buck I was after or any buck for that matter comes busting out of the brush seemingly uninjured. It gives me a shot. I take the shot and I know for a fact that shot connected as the buck that ran into view uninjured is now carrying a leg and bleeding.
Wow! In your case, I'd have grabbed the little fella by the scruff and kicked him in his arse and sent him back to camp without supper. I would have also told him I would let Santa know and to expect coal in his stocking.I had an incident like this 20 plus years ago. It was a legit 185 class buck on public land. I was hunting with a group of four guys. I shot the buck and it went down. One of the guys in the group ran up (scampered up in deep snow because he was just a little guy) to the downed deer and put his muzzle to the deer’s head. Again, the buck was down. I stopped him and asked what he thought he was doing. He said he was “putting him out of its misery”. He then then put the muzzle to the deer’s chest and shot. He started jumping up and down about the huge buck he killed. He immediately tagged the buck and was yelling and screaming because of how big his deer was. The two other guys told him it was my deer. He started to panic and was getting set for an argument. He kept saying that he put the killing shot on the deer when he shot it in the chest (contact wound).
I simply said congrats on an awesome deer. I never hunted with that group again. I can’t imagine having a deer, elk, grouse (insert whatever animal here) that somebody else shot. It would make me feel like a fool.
The more and more I see these crazy threads, the l more I fear hunting (as I know it) is dying. I sincerely hope he looks at the deer and understands he is an asshat. Awesome to self admit taking a 700 yard shot, without ranging, just to steal a lady’s deer.
No the evidence did not show that, her version of the story claimed that. But the fact seems that if a person cant figure out how to find an animal in the scope they probably should not be shooting over 600 yards... Can you show the proof or evidence that she hit it twice? They claimed she hit it twice, his story says she hit once low abdomen in a non lethal or at the very least not lethal anytime soon.Young girl/young lady whatever.....is it a crime to help someone set up to take a shot? I have 2 nieces that have taken some GREAT animals, is it wrong my brother and I have helped them get set up? Less of a trophy? Evidence shows she hit the deer 2 times and the only bullet he put in it was when he blew past her and shot it.
I can guarantee if that was my niece, granddaughter, wife, etc that dude would need help getting off the mountain. But it never would have gotten that far because bullys are cowards and cowards walk away when confronted.
He took that deer from her period...no way to argue otherwise.
He is a bully that took her deer to satisfy his ego.
How the hell can he feel good about it?
I wish I was so wise... Lesson learnedi stopped at "not my story"
ive been around enough utards to know when to stop paying attention
Had a General Council that used to always say if it weren't for the 99% of lawyers the 1% wouldn't seem so bad hahaha.I’ve read a fair amount of his stuff over the years, I’d profile him as a dude who is concerned about being right, not so much about doing the right thing.
He’d make a good lawyer IMO ?
I'd have to lean towards the woman's side on this after reading through, but this Easton doesn't sound like much of a "man" either. How could he let someone take that buck if it was rightfully his wifes'? But, I wansn't there. Maybe Abraham is a big fella.There were definitely mistakes on the ladies and her husbands side, but Aram ain’t no kind of man at all…
Todd
If this was a duck instead of a buck, both parties would deny having to take it.
“I shot at it also but I’m sure you killed it. You take it”.
So are you saying you would go hands on over a dead deer with at least one armed person present?????I'd have to lean towards the woman's side on this after reading through, but this Easton doesn't sound like much of a "man" either. How could he let someone take that buck if it was rightfully his wifes'? But, I wansn't there. Maybe Abraham is a big fella.
Not me. Your last post talking about being a man and how big someone is.What makes you think you'd have to go hands on?
?Not me. Your last post talking about being a man and how big someone is.
I would think this will not look good to Outdoor life
Like I said earlier, A CO should have been called.So are you saying you would go hands on over a dead deer with at least one armed person present?????
It wasn't Texas.....some states can't get away with shooting first...then asking questions....So are you saying you would go hands on over a dead deer with at least one armed person present?????
so.....who is he?Aram is a member of this forum fyi
Awe...somebody's feelers got hurt by the negative utah comments...Why would anybody admit they're from California. I would claim I was an illegal from Argentina.
Learn punctuation......then we might know wtf you are talking aboutI have removed my recent post.
I have involved the UDWR authorities to help sort this all out. This may take some time, but I will do my best to keep you apprised.
This is from Aram's Facebook.
Are you talking to me??? I literally copied and pasted what Aram posted. Just added it was from his Facebook.Learn punctuation......then we might know wtf you are talking about
Haha okay. Pretty sure you can know what I'm talking about. sorry Arams Facebook.yes....talking to you
I have removed my recent post.
I have involved the UDWR authorities to help sort this all out. This may take some time, but I will do my best to keep you apprised.
This is from Aram's Facebook.
Just so everyone is clear, this is what Aram posted on his Facebook today.I have removed my recent post.
I have involved the UDWR authorities to help sort this all out. This may take some time, but I will do my best to keep you apprised.
This is from Aram's Facebook.
I’m not so sure?You Don't need to Contact The DWR!
You Needed To MAN-UP The day It Happened & You Shoulda Done The RIGHT Thing Then!
Sometimes ETHICS Over-Rule What The Law Says!
And Yes I Do Know That The Laws/Rules Say The Pearson That Kills/Finishes The Animal Off 'Can' Claim The Animal!
EDIT: As Soon As The DWR Tells Him He Is The The Person That Can Legally Tag The Buck Since He Shot It Last It'll Be Put On The WWW & Everything's CHERRY!
"Tagging requirementsUtah Code § 23-20-30 and Utah Admin. Rule R657-5-17After you’ve taken a big game animal, you must tag the animal before moving the carcass or leaving the site of the kill. To tag a big game animal, completely detach the tag from your big game permit and completely remove the three notches that indicate the date the animal was taken and the sex of the animal. Then, attach the tag to the animal so that the tag remains securely fastened and visible. You may not remove more than one notch indicating the date or sex, or tag more than one animal, using the same tag. Also, you may not hunt or pursue big game after any of the notches have been removed from the tag or the tag has been detached from your permit.Your tag must remain with the largest portion of the animal’s me"
I wonder if he'll talk with the UDWR about his tagging process...
Why do something logical like that when you can get the DWR involved identify minor infractions from both parties, get the deer confiscated and some warnings issued.I have read both sides; ultimately I think he manipulated the situation in every facet to justify why he should have a deer. Most hunters live by first blood, others can jump in and help retrieve but ultimately the first one to shoot at and hit the buck should have every opportunity to finish the harvest. Just give the horns back to the rightful hunter and be done with it.
Ouch……you didn’t need to bring that up…..lolI guess their are people who don’t abide by fist come first serve. Makes me harken back to those guys that were pissed at Founder for shooting a Buck that they were already shooting at. While he was standing only a few feet from them.
That one stung a bit...Ouch……you didn’t need to bring that up…..lol
I guess their are people who don’t abide by fist come first serve. Makes me harken back to those guys that were pissed at Founder for shooting a Buck that they were already shooting at. While he was standing only a few feet from them.
I heard Founder made him pack it out too...Guys? I think it was a 12 year old kid.
I think he was a boy scout that volunteered at Thanksgiving handing out meals to the homeless
I think he is still having hearing issues from the muzzle blast of Founders rifle.
They are just moving back they all went to Cali from the east to begin with.It’s just soooooo special that all the kali’s move here.
That pretty much solves the question of who was most wrong.Easier to read if anyone really cares:View attachment 125001
Bingo!!! This!?Where I come from, first blood takes the buck. I agree, tough situation, but I would have done the right thing and let her have it, and been happy I got to help end it quickly. Obviously this guy is too caught up in his FB/Instagram notoriety to do the right thing.
Kind of a "no brainer" especially since he admitted the no collar thing.She adamantly insisted all along that the deer she was shooting at had a collar. Aram said he didn't see a collar on the deer he was shooting at but could be mistaken.(eye roll) The deer they finished off has a collar.
Give the deer back, Aram.
I think he already is…I wouldn't take it back now for all the tea in China......Let Aram sleep with it.....
Lmmfao! Good one runamuk…
For some, it is more about defending honor of one's wife.So are you saying you would go hands on over a dead deer with at least one armed person present?????
I agree.....let him stare at it on his wall knowing he stole it from a woman.I wouldn't take it back now for all the tea in China......Let Aram sleep with it.....
And ruined his outdoor career….I agree.....let him stare at it on his wall knowing he stole it from a woman.
Then kick his ass SeabassAram is a member of this forum fyi
I guide hunters every year that cant find a buck deer in their scope at 150yds. They still have the right to be out there hunting. I agree she probably should not be taking 600+ yard shots. Either way an unfortunate event that wasnt handled very well by the greedy "experieced" hunter.No the evidence did not show that, her version of the story claimed that. But the fact seems that if a person cant figure out how to find an animal in the scope they probably should not be shooting over 600 yards... Can you show the proof or evidence that she hit it twice? They claimed she hit it twice, his story says she hit once low abdomen in a non lethal or at the very least not lethal anytime soon.
Either way they both screwed up. The truth lies someplace in the middle. Her account is slanted and skewed, his account is also slanted and skewed. However I don't believe for one second that Easton would have stood around and let this man bully his wife? What sort of beta male would allow this to happen the way she described it? Obviously from your response you would not, I would not, so why did Easton let it go? Is it that Easton realized that they screwed and lost the deer and someone else cleaned up their mess? If her story is so certain and it checks out, why cry on social media and not contact authorities?
If the guy was racing down the track, the guy was being an ass, or anything else claimed, where is the cell phone video?
Either way, the real lesson here is make a good clean kill shot, if you can't hold or handle a gun or you cant find an animal in the scope lets not try a shot over 500 yards, don't agree to something in the field then stew on it and throw crap all over social media, on his end pictures, don't play the victim, video again worth a 1000 words...
It is messed up and both parties screwed up and both parties are in the wrong.
I respect Brian he took a beating like a manOuch……you didn’t need to bring that up…..lol
When he said he wasn't going to steal their buck they should have said then back the F off.Is anyone buying this dude’s BS? He even admitted he said this in his story: “I’m not going to steal you wife’s buck” and then immediately proceeds to do just that. Seriously mind blowing.
What kind of man or sportsman doesn’t do everything he can to have that woman shoot and kill that buck? Even if we buy entirely that he innocently came across the same buck at the shot site, from that second forward it should have been 100% about helping that lady find and kill that buck.
Goodness I have lots of negative things to say…so I should just stop typing.
If this is law, I've certainly never seen it, nor do I agree with it in the least bit.The DWR law is clear. The one to put it down can claim the deer. They should determine he put the final shot so it’s his…to me, when you see somebody tracking a deer you shouldn’t jump over them to get the final shot and claim the deer.
This guy should have helped them track the deer and put it down. Then IMO, congratulated the lady on her deer. Instead he shows his ass. Given the articles he wrote about two guys jumping in front of him and ruining his hunt…it makes this one even more sad.
In the end he will get the deer and loose his reputation in the industry. Not worth it.
Shame you don’t know the law. Big guide should know it.If this is law, I've certainly never seen it, nor do I agree with it in the least bit.
Please post the verbiage?
little late.....thanks Manny
#172Someone should post his mug shot here.
Been there.I saw fist fight over a goose once. Someone called the game warden (not me) and one guy was arrested. Actually it was a brant, well worth fighting over, IMO.