JB1975
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,895
Why not post the pic of it on the ground or wall instead of the blurry pic from distance?I did kill that buck.
Why not post the pic of it on the ground or wall instead of the blurry pic from distance?I did kill that buck.
Ok.Why not post the pic of it on the ground or wall instead of the blurry pic from distance?
Thanks. Cool goat
Yep, and a classic case of 16 3/4 inch length not being enough to make 80 net. But, not many pronghorn in Wyoming make it over 16 inches.Boy those prongs are low
Buzz - B&C records show you w/ one pronghorn in the all-time book, and a woman, presumably your wife, w/ three in the annual-awards list.Between my wife and I we have 5 officially scored net B&C pronghorn from Wyoming ,none over 16.
Stalk much?Buzz - B&C records show you w/ one pronghorn in the all-time book, and a woman, presumably your wife, w/ three in the annual-awards list.
Just curious… but what happened to book buck No. 5?
That would be this buck, my wife shot. Officially scored but never entered, her highest scoring buck as well. Also a buck of several lifetimes with lots of extra character.Buzz - B&C records show you w/ one pronghorn in the all-time book, and a woman, presumably your wife, w/ three in the annual-awards list.
Just curious… but what happened to book buck No. 5?
Zoom in...it does.Very nice and unique buck. Amazing how all the neat extras and uniqueness really does not show in the Live Photo.
Yes, there is a reason.Outstanding buck. Congrats to your wife.
Any reason why, after entering four pronghorn with B&C, you (or she) decided not to enter this one?
You sure are persistent. Sounds like you need a hobby.Outstanding buck. Congrats to your wife.
Any reason why, after entering four pronghorn with B&C, you (or she) decided not to enter this one?
As you probably know, B&C scoring can disadvantage pronghorns with low prongs by pushing three of the four circumference measurements above the prong. This, and the fact that Buzz’ buck has, at best, average prongs and mass, results in a score below 80”, notwithstanding the exceptional length.Boy those prongs are low
That buck got 2 mass measurements below the prong and gross scored over 80.As you probably know, B&C scoring can disadvantage pronghorns with low prongs by pushing three of the four circumference measurements above the prong. This, and the fact that Buzz’ buck has, at best, average prongs and mass, results in a score below 80”, notwithstanding the exceptional length.
It is probably good that Buzz burned a tag on this interesting, but otherwise somewhat freaky buck, by getting its genes out of the gene-pool.
In contrast, my 2023 buck has relatively high prongs. For my table-scoring, I took only two circumference measurements below the prong, but it is a close call. It would not surprise me if an official scorer would decide to take three measurements below the prong. We’ll see.
HT
Wow… undoubtedly the best buck I’ve seen this season. Could you share anything about the hunt, including Unit no.?
It was 2016, and no on the unit no.Wow… undoubtedly the best buck I’ve seen this season. Could you share anything about the hunt, including Unit no.?
They're all gone now anyway.Well the last pic Is a dead give away on unit number if you know you know ?
Yea for a few years they'll come back as long as they keep tag numbers low for a while hopefullyThey're all gone now anyway.
Yes - go check out exetreme outfitters IG page, Rolodex of big WY bucks this year and some 16+ easily.Has anyone else seen or heard of any long pronghorn being taken in Wyoming so far this season?
HT
All the ones I looked at on Instagram look to be well under 16 tall to me someYes - go check out exetreme outfitters IG page, Rolodex of big WY bucks this year and some 16+ easily.
how tall would you say this one is?If some of the ones I saw are under, "well under" would be like a fraction of an inch.
FWIW, I'm not seeing 80 on the initial buck. Not meant to be negative, but I'd never guess it at that. It's a pretty nice buck regardless of numbers. Have it measured and enter into B&C awards if it makes it.Whether bad photography or not, I’ve never been one to push an animal way out ahead of me, like some fisherman holding his trout at arm’s length, just to give the illusion of a bigger buck. In my field photos, I try to be right beside the animal.
I have no beef with those who do pose well behind their animal. We’re all hunters, who at some level need to stand together. So as long as it’s legal… to each his own.
HT
15 maybe a hair over could of been 15 1/4 I dont remember exactly I also score with a tight tape. I can honestly say I've never seen a 16" tall goat hit the dirt in wyoHard to tell, with field photos and .5 lens overuse nowdays. That's not what I'd call short, I'd say 7.5" to top of prong and 8.5 from top of prong to tip. So I'd guess roughly 16. Definately long below prong.
also is that buck's head really as broad as the hunter's chest? Is the hunter a dwarf, or is that antelope the size as one of those wild mustangs?how tall would you say this one is?
View attachment 121397
View attachment 121398
View attachment 121399
Scores are BS until the guy who's an official measurer does it. I"ve got a half dozen that were officially measured over 16"15 maybe a hair over could of been 15 1/4 I dont remember exactly I also score with a tight tape. I can honestly say I've never seen a 16" tall goat hit the dirt in wyo
I'm not saying they don't get killed in wyo I'm saying I've never seen one hit the dirt. I've seen bucks that would probably go 16 tall but they either didn't have mass or not much cutter or usually both to where they didn't look to me like they would book.Scores are BS until the guy who's an official measurer does it. I"ve got a half dozen that were officially measured over 16"
I wouldn't have any to contribute ? that's really cool though 16" bucks are a rare thing hereI was just looking back and think i have 8 bucks that officially measured 16 or longer. 2 from WY (rifle), one from AZ (Muzzleloader), 2 from MT (archery) and 3 from MT rifle. A handful of other really great ones in the 14s and 15s from MT and WY. Start and new thread "real 16s".
There's my favorite antelope of all timeAnother 17 & a 16 6/8
View attachment 121414
Yeah that one on the leftThere's my favorite antelope of all time
I'll never forget you telling Newberg what you nicknamed that pronghorn when Jeff and I were at your place, even he was laughing.
I noticed that also. Hard to get a feel on size with photos like that.All the ones I looked at on Instagram look to be well under 16 tall to me some
really good forced angles on several of them.
Great looking bucksMy son shot a B&C awards buck during archery of that same hunt, after missing a true giant twice. Had to talk him into this one.
View attachment 121378
View attachment 121379
View attachment 121380
You've definitely killed your share of big ones hopefully numbers come back up and so do tagsAlways like a good antelope thread with pictures and arguments. This is one of the first years I've went without a buck antelope permit somewhere, maybe the first time since 1991. I did draw a MT b tag and got a doe with an arrow couple weeks back so have had some fresh steaks. Changed my profile pic to last year's buck, Not16" but did measure over 15 and a P&Y buck.
I think that might be the best description of what a trophy should be.B&C, P&Y, SCI, don't care a whoop about none and not because I don't have horns and racks that qualify. Score is an inaccurate way to judge a trophy, but the best way that I know, so I tend to talk B&C gross. Gross score gives an idea how big the specimen is compared to others, but doesn't really tell the whole story.
I'll never kill the biggest of anything, but that doesn't mean what I have isn't cool to me. I'll never get tired of looking at my horns and racks. Each one is a different story. Big and old is where it's at; and the bigger the gross, the better.
Awesome bucks on here everyone!
Big and old is where it's at
You only need Buzz’ permission. If he’s okay with it, you’re good. He knows everything.I'll be careful with posting pictures here. I'll be careful to ask permission, and also ask how to word the description.
I believe they were asking for an update because you mentioned earlier that you would pick the horns up from the taxidermist to have them scored once the drying period was complete.Thanks for putting my thread back up to the top of the stack. Let’s keep it here!
After I get my buck back from the taxi, you will get an official score sheet.
If it nets over 80”, and I am confident it will, I will submit it to B&C. Unlike some here, I don’t have any reasons for not reporting a legally taken animal.
HT
I understand your interest. Mine too!I believe they were asking for an update because you mentioned earlier that you would pick the horns up from the taxidermist to have them scored once the drying period was complete.
I think more than a few of us are interested to know at this point, for various reasons.
Most of the ones asking are asking because they are a$$es. I am sure many are curious but this is ridiculous. What does it really matter? It is a great buck, end of story.I think more than a few of us are interested to know at this point, for various reasons.
I'm not sure what part of my post you find ridiculous. HT said he was going to do something earlier in the thread so I simply pointed that out since it is time. I have genuine curiosity as to what the buck scores. Antelope are interesting to me. I have one B&C and one P&Y that barely make book but have harvested a few others I thought would make it but they fell a little short.Most of the ones asking are asking because they are a$$es. I am sure many are curious but this is ridiculous. What does it really matter? It is a great buck, end of story.
Sorry, I was throwing that ridiculous at the masses, not you specifically. He also said he was going to measure it when he got it back from the taxi. We will all have to just wait a bit.I'm not sure what part of my post you find ridiculous. HT said he was going to do something earlier in the thread so I simply pointed that out since it is time. I have genuine curiosity as to what the buck scores. Antelope are interesting to me. I have one B&C and one P&Y that barely make book but have harvested a few others I thought would make it but they fell a little short.
As to the rest of the back and forth from a few months ago, I have no comment.
I’d kill that one fo sho!!Report back with an official score, that would be interesting.
Oh, and here's something interesting since you seem to want to talk about interesting things other than pronghorn scores.
Don't care what it scores, but definitely not going to try to make it an 85 inch buck. I may try to kill him if he survives until my season opens.
Interesting enough for you?
View attachment 120131
View attachment 120132
The awards just come. Don’t ask for them… they just come.wow, just asking! whatever the score, either + or - of 80" and you'll win the wyomingwedon'tgiveashit trophy, since you love awards
Happy for him. Hope he gets an award. He deserves it!hey hey HT....do you know who you are talking to??....P.T. drug the new WR typical mule deer....
Here's your trophy HTHappy for him. Hope he gets an award. He deserves it!
Merry Christmas, everybody!
HT
Not bad 3 more winters like this there might be almost as many antelope as there should beNo, but thanks for asking. I decided to wait until I get it back from the taxidermist. I’ll post the score sheet then.
Does anyone have an update on range conditions in the Red Desert this winter?
This is only a general question. Not looking for jm77’s hidey-hole.
Web cams along I-80 show very little snow.Not bad 3 more winters like this there might be almost as many antelope as there should be
Don't even hunt there @HornedAssNo, but thanks for asking. I decided to wait until I get it back from the taxidermist. I’ll post the score sheet then.
Does anyone have an update on range conditions in the Red Desert this winter?
This is only a general question. Not looking for jm77’s hidey-hole.
Definitely has some like every aspect of life. Fortunately there is a lot more good helpful people here. Just like life, wade through them.This forum really is full of A-holes.
Heh… strike a nerve?Don't even hunt there @HornedAss
Next level goats. That unique buck is what I think about when it comes to antelope, incredible.Another 17 & a 16 6/8
View attachment 121414
"Aren’t you the doofus who guessed my pronghorn at low-70’s?"-HTName calling is the product of a small mind.
HT
Heh… strike a nerve?
You know what they say, “If the shoe fits… wear it”.
If not, lighten up. Name calling is the product of a small mind.
HT
It's well past the dry period, what's the official results? Pics are bad, but even gifting it more than I should I'm not seeing 80 gross. I'm always interested in the ones that trick me, but I'm getting under 15" for length. 6.5 for both bottoms and 6.5 total on top with a 5" prong. I'd say 79 gross would be over generous. Excited to be wrong. Regardless, a nice looking buck.
Another 17 & a 16 6/8
View attachment 121414
Thanks, I like to think antelope are one of my specialties.While those are giant pronghorn I must say what beautiful taxidermy! Wow!
Sounds like our presidency!
What did it gross? You tell the net on one but the gross on the other two ?My Red Desert pronghorn is on the wall. He net scored 79-6/8”, but still shows well matched with my two 85” gross antelope, being noticeably bigger in body and head and more vividly marked.
My Wyoming bighorn is on the left.
It’s been fun engaging with you guys on MM. Good luck on your future hunts.
HT
We focus on trophy elk, mule deer, antelope and moose hunts and take B&C bucks most years.