LAST EDITED ON Dec-16-14 AT 06:07PM (MST)[p]OK, Mike.
In my most gentle voice, so as not to offend anyone.
You stated that you point averaged and "drew an antelope area you like to hunt one year sooner than I should have".
How does that impact point creep and the guys with less points, or those that are applying alone.
Case in point:
Say a unit takes 4 points to draw...a guy with 4 points applies solo. Another group of 5 applicants applies with 1 guy that has 3 points, 2 that have 4 and 2 that have 5. Total points for the part is: 1x3=3 2x4=8 2x5=10 for a total of 21 points. Average, is 4.2 per applicant.
Now the poor SOB that's waited his 4 years is shoved to the side, tagless, and a guy with less points (the 3 point dude) now has a tag.
Just curious who's looking out for the NR hunters that apply solo or with others with the same point totals????
You Mike...is Jims?
Point creep follows right along...and pretty quick areas that used to take 2-3 points now take 4-5, and on and on and on.
That's why jims home state of Colorado went away from point averaging, and exactly why Wyoming should follow suit...
So, you can join the rest of the group that call me a narcissist all you want...but I try to look out for everyone and create the most fair system we can...FOR ALL HUNTERS. Also the precise reason that I fought the point system for Residents in Wyoming. The unscrupulous will use a system to their advantage, every single time they can, without a second fuggin' thought for anyone else.
I do applaud jims for his ability to do simple math, even if he is the real reason that point averaging needs to be taken away.