A novel thought that I would suggest.
Do some research on your topic before deciding the conclusion. If you are concerned about the state of Big Game populations in Idaho and wether or not Fish and Game Policy/Management is the primary factor, do some research.
Starting here with Hunters is a good resource for opinions and maybe even a few facts, suprisingly you may not find they all support the Fish and Game is the primary or even sole factor.
Seek some professional studies that may discuss the impacts of the big game species you are concerned about to see their conclusions. Compare the relative change over time to that of other States to see if Idaho is isolated.
Last, seek some counsel from the group you are primarily pointing the finger at. I can recommend that you give Bill London a call. Bill is the Regional Supervisor of the Conservation Officers in SW Idaho, covering most of the units mentioned 32, 32a, 39. Bill can address both questions you have, "poaching" and "why has Fish and Game done such a bad job". PM me directly and I'll get you Bill's contact info, or simply call the downtown or Nampa Fish and Game offices and they will direct you.
Please, after you have had this discussion and done some research, report back to us what you think.
Another suggestion. Be sure to define your question. Who do you think Fish and Game has done a bad job for 1) All Sportsmen 2) The wildlife themselves 3) Trophy Hunters 4) All of the Above.
P.S. The amount of time it will take to do this research is less than you think, most via the internet and a call to Bill.