>>
LAST EDITED ON Aug-08-12
>>AT 08:24?AM (MST)
>>
>>I've met the guy and would
>>be interested in hearing his
>>side of the story! And
>>did someone take him to
>>small claims court? If not,
>>why not?
>
>Although a pancake is flat it
>does have two sides, there
>is NO excuses for using
>or losing a clients money
>that was paid in trust
>for a specific product. We
>later found out the money
>was "invested" and the investment
>went bad prior to the
>hunt.
>Who gave the permission for any
>funds at all that were
>paid for an elk hunt
>to be invested into anything
>other than the hunt it's
>self?? That's fraud no matter
>how you slice or dice
>it. The reason it was
>not taken to litigation was
>because this whole thing was
>done out of trust between
>friends, therefore nothing was drawn
>up on paper.......bad mistake and
>lesson learned.
>The entire thing was a nightmare
>but turned out on a
>great note other than some
>friendships burned and a hunt
>that cost double what it
>should have, a lot of
>new friends were made.
>Although Stinky may be hated here
>on the forums, he does
>have a soft heart when
>it comes to financial struggles
>because he has been there
>and does have a little
>sympathy for it.
>There was also another client involved
>in this situation but on
>a differen't hunt. His money
>was also gone, but was
>recovered after a lengthly battle
>and threats made.
>It's all said and done now,
>but obviously still haunts a
>few people after four years.
>
>Maybe the reason i still have
>very bitter feelings on this
>is due to the fact
>that there has never been
>any closure. There has not
>been any apologies, explanations or
>admission of guilt, only excuses
>and finger pointing.
>Therefore it is what it is......
>
>
>
>
Thanks! Hopefully, Pro will read this and the two (or three) of you will be able to resolve this ongoing issue in a civil manner.