What I consider to not be fair is that there is a chance that a person can have a herd of antelope on their own land, and by no fault of their own, may literally never get the chance (or never have the chance to increase his own odds)to hunt that publicly owned species of animal if they don't get lucky. That is why I brought this up in this post- because it's obvious this poster is not some Joe-Schmo in Meridian who applied because it's the closest unit to his house. I am very glad that this hunter who started this post got to knock a lope to dirt in his backyard. I hope you will post a picture of him if you get one.
As another person said, I guess down-home Idaho hunters like that feeling of having to gamble every year. As another person said- perhaps in the end it keeps the big money away. Personally, I think gambling every year that I might get the chance to hunt antelope in my own state sucks. As I said, I have drawn 1 time in 10 years, which is technically about right for the hunt I apply to every year, but unfortunately I am no better off 9 years ago than I am today.
If someone told me that I could hunt antelope 1 time in the next 10 years (kind of like a point system would allow based on increasing odds), I would take that instead of hoping to get lucky in the current system and beat the odds to draw 2 times in 10 years but maybe not get to hunt in 25 years. A good gambler uses odds in his favor...
Waiting periods also work and would remove the opposition who dislike the point system for big money out-of-stater (HuntinFool types) reasons.
I also know some opposition comes from people worried about kids never getting to draw in their youth. Waiting periods also work for kids- or a special pool could be created for 10-18 year-olds. Frankly, youth hunting could be the most important challenge we hunters face.