Just to clarify, they did kill this buck during the season TheKnack.
Also, while the hunter did have the help of guides (I believe two), he did spend 16 days hunting. After locating the buck pictured above, Mike said it took them 4-1/2 days to get it done.
The fact is, the state of Colorado has a season that runs from Sept. 1 to Dec. 31, just as they have many other seasons. It just so happens that only 4 people get to hunt that season. The conversation about killing a deer on the winter range extends far beyond governor tag seasons. Heck, during a 3rd and 4th season, most (possibly all) deer are on their winter range, AND RUTTING!!! Most who have experience hunting Colorado know this.
Killing big bucks during the rut (during the 3rd and 4th season) is just as easy, if not easier, than killing them in December. Most people with experience in the field during these times know this.
I think the argument about "how easy it is" and how it's like shooting fish in a barrel is a bit weak.
The fact is, whether it's in November during a 3rd or 4th season or in December, "killing" a deer with a high powered rifle isn't the big challenge, finding one is. That's the challenge in December also.
TheKnack, you are incorrect thinking that a raffle or an "an extra buck or two for a shot at drawing the tag" would raise more money than auctioning the tag. Take a look at all history of autcion tags versus raffle and/or sportsmans tags and you'll see that the auction tag brings far more money with far less overhead. Whether it's good or bad is each persons opinion, I'm just letting you know that you thinking that a drawing would raise more money, is incorrect. They don't auction the tags to give a rich guy the advantaged, they auction the tags to raise the most money. If raffling a tag raised more money, they would raffle the tags.
Believe me, when it came to the Antelope Island hunt in Utah, that is exactly what I wanted, all tags to go in a drawing rather than any be auctioned, but in the end, the park wanted the money and auction tags are part of the deal.
Now, I'm not defending auction tags, gov. tags, conservation tags, or even landowner tags here. I have my opinions on them all. I'm simply hoping you dig a bit deeper before making some comments. TheKnack, I like you buddy. I'm responding to your post because of that.
As far as all you guys jumping on this dude above for hiring a guide, I think it's pretty crappy of you. I've never used a guide, haven't used a travel agent, don't use another to do my taxes, didn't need to hire a person to build my garage, didn't need to hire anyone to rebuild the engine in my ATV, don't need to hire anyone to winterize my boat, and didn't need to hire anyone to build this website. The list goes on. Wouldn't it be pretty pathetic if I sat here putting people who do have to hire someone for those services down? That's exactly how you all sound. Whoopy doo that YOU don't need to hire a guide. Good for you, but obviously the guy above wanted to. That doesn't make him anything less than you.
Next time you pay for a service, think about how other people are on a website somewhere talking about what a loser you are for doing so.
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com