Hunting 50,
Can you prove you didn't beat your wife last night? Can I prove things would be better without SFW? No! Can you prove they would be worse?
Now for the original question, SFW came on the scene in Utah and put some weight behind Prop 5, which was a GREAT IDEA, while not members, my family supported this push with calls and letters, etc. It seemed like a group that supported what AVERAGE sportsmen wanted was a great idea. In the begining I believe they were just that. THEN, they found they needed money, buying politicians is expensive. Enter the expo. We saw what was SUPPOSED to be a way to raise money for wildlife, with SFW as the "auctioneer". Good idea, sell some tags, put the money towards wildlife improvement.
So far so good. Then questions come up, how much is going for wildlife, what are the odds? Simple questions with simple answers. When those answers didn't come simply, it raised flags. When an insider(Tony Abbott) started going after what was started(by him), and what had become of it, it raised questions(whether he did it for revenge or the goodness of his heart, his questions were valid, and have been validated as time passes).
What do I think happened? I think Don Peay became enamored with power. I think along the way we forgot that all his power came from his members who, to their credit were out doing grunt work, feeding deer, etc., and started to believe he was the savior of wildlife in this state. He started traveling in circles where professional basketball players talk about 6 figures to hunt deer on a closed island. Where doctors yearly drop a half million to hunt just in Utah. In short, absolute power corrupted absolutely. THEN, the Obama recession hit. Many of his high dollar "friends" had their hunting money hit. Perhaps they agreed with Mossback about there not being a "good enough" elk. So what does a group that is totally dependent on deep pockets and state welfare do? They again go to the average sportsman for a power base(SFW's recent outpouring for support to help the mule deer), while in the back rooms and legislatures pushing for more welfare, and even for locking up ownership of wildlife.
This all being done while their local members are out doing good work, and being put in the position of defending a VERY POLARIZING head.
In short SFW gets their power by pushing for what they want because their leadership is good a focusing a message. Why we have numerous questions/complaints, they have a focused message and populate the RACs with it. They are also very good at PR. While I am at work, THE DON is on capitol hill buying politicians, he has access, I don't.
In short I believe the original, grassroots org. that helped pass prop 5 was a great idea. What has happened since then is the leadership sold out to the highest bidder, and their run of the mill guys still believe in the vision and are commited to it. Too bad their good work is overwhelmed by THE DON.
When they came for the road hunters I was not one so I said nothing. When they came for the oppurtunists I was not one so I said nothing. When they came for the public land hunters I was not one so I said nothing. When they came for me there was no one left to say anything!