PIC ON ROLLING STONES!!!

LAST EDITED ON Jul-18-13 AT 09:29AM (MST)[p]Man we're getting touchy....... They ran Charles Manson on the cover back in 1970 and no one posted a thing on here....... :) Terry
 
>LAST EDITED ON Jul-18-13
>AT 09:29?AM (MST)

>
>Man we're getting touchy....... They ran
>Charles Manson on the cover
>back in 1970 and no
>one posted a thing on
>here....... :) Terry


Um that's because this site wasn't here in the 70's.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jul-18-13 AT 11:49AM (MST)[p]>Make a mental note...... You can't
>pull the wool over jarheads
>eyes...... Terry

Good mental note.
 
The issue with Manson on the cover is a collectors find and worth big money. Manson was one ugly little sucker. I have no idea why people would want it but whatever.
 
Journalism is journalism, whats the big deal about?

I've spent 25 yrs in the military, seen a few wars and know more than I care to about terrorists and terrorism in the world. If you "read" Rolling Stone for its article content, who cares about the picture idiot on the cover.

I can think of better pictures to burn brain cells on.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom