I was just washing dishes thinking about this thread and the complaints the poster in this thread had about the hunt. The four complaints we heard were;
1 - Guide has inexpensive optics
2 - Guide didn't use tripod with binoculars
3 - Saddle had problems
4 - Client was left at camp after falling off horse
For issues 1 & 2, the client should have asked when he booked if his guide would have expensive optics or not, AND if the guide used a tripod to glass with bino's. It's a small percentage of guides who use tripods with bino's, so that should never be something the client should have "assumed". As for expensive bino's, I think it's silly, but if that's what seperates a guide who knows what he's doing from one that don't in this client's eyes, then OK. But he should have asked before booking the hunt.
Issue 3. Sure, maybe the equipment could have been looked over more closely before putting it on the horse. Maybe it was fine when put on the horse. Who knows? But I've hunted enough to know that horse tack does fail and it's part of the deal. None of us saw the saddle, and the client obviously wasn't too concerned about it when he jumped up on it. Certainly not something that should "ruin the hunt", or even result in horribly negative review online.
Issue 4. Client says he was left at camp, and that is what many on the thread have been critical of. The client says Robb met them at camp that morning when they returned, so Robb
was concerned. The client at that point obviously didn't think he was too hurt, or he would have asked to be taken to a hospital. Now, some may think the guide should sit at camp with the client, but I think that is silly, but we can agree to disagree on that (remember, client didn't think it was bad enough to go to hospital and it was a bruise on hip. No blood spewing out). And on a side note, often times there's a camp cook in camp. Someone does the cooking! Was that person there at the camp??? Or another guide? Anyone? That was not mentioned in story.
On day 3 they asked client if he wanted to hunt and he said no. He ended the story with us there, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he had told them when he said no, that he was planning on leaving. So, if that's the case and the client doesn't think his injury is bad enough for hospital or clinic, why would the guide sit in camp?
I have a hard time with blaming the guide and outfitter as they have been in this thread. We're talking about a bruise, and a client that didn't think it was bad enough to even run to a clinic and get some powerful pain killers. We're talking about a small issue with a saddle, and we're talking about issue 1 & 2. Those are simply silly.
I don't want to make light of the clients injury or his dissatisfaction with his experience, I'm just sharing my view on this. I had to voice my thoughts because I hate to see a business (any business) get a bad rap when maybe they don't deserve it. At least to the huge extent as this.
So there you go. Whatcha' got to say?
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com on Facebook!