BPKHunter
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,783
I have used a Nikon Monarch 1200 for 6 years now and I have been fairly happy. My only criticism at all is 1)Slighly larger than some pricier competitors and 2) Typically only realistically range consistent to 750-850 yards, which again is only less than pricier competitors(Leica/Swaro). These issues have not warranted paying the extra $6-700 bucks to fix.
Now I see Nikon has a 1000 with the angle compensation for around $350. I have not heard good things about other brands(Leupold/Bushnell) on their angle compensation on long-ranges. Has anyone heard if or tried the new Nikon and can they speak to the new technology and the reliability of the laser?
Also, I see Leica just came out with 1600 yard version of their small unit. Any feedback.
FYI, before anyone flames me on how you don't need a rangefinder for more than 300 yards, just stop yourself. I only shoot withing my well-practiced effective range, but I want as LONG a range-finding capability as I can get as it helps me know how far I have to stalk and what place I need to get to to have a realistic shot.
Now I see Nikon has a 1000 with the angle compensation for around $350. I have not heard good things about other brands(Leupold/Bushnell) on their angle compensation on long-ranges. Has anyone heard if or tried the new Nikon and can they speak to the new technology and the reliability of the laser?
Also, I see Leica just came out with 1600 yard version of their small unit. Any feedback.
FYI, before anyone flames me on how you don't need a rangefinder for more than 300 yards, just stop yourself. I only shoot withing my well-practiced effective range, but I want as LONG a range-finding capability as I can get as it helps me know how far I have to stalk and what place I need to get to to have a realistic shot.