>Bonuspoint,
>
>In almost NO BUSINESS. I've
>been a banker for 30+
>years and have seen the
>tax returns & financial statements
>from all kinds of businesses
>(farms to shoe stores, to
>electrical contractors to anything on
>main street). That just
>isn't approached....except by Drs., dentists,
>CPAs or lawyers (not guaranteed
>there).
>
>The NBA discussion ISN'T about 50%
>of the profit (which would
>be absurdly low). It's
>about 50% of the gross.
>
>
>Whether anyone likes the NBA or
>not, a business model must
>allow the company to be
>profitable. Most NBA teams
>are not.
>
>I've been a Laker's fan since
>West and Baylor; so my
>team has "done well".
>BUT for things to work
>long-term, the small-market teams (Denver,
>Minnesota, Utah & many others)
>must be able to compete
>financially with the large markets.
>
>
>
>Within the shadows, go quietly. .
GB,
This is bonuspoint. I specified "service" industry. your "except fors" are a closer representation of what I am talking about. Farms and shoes stores are production based. I would venture that most industries where the employee is the product, over 50% of the "income" would go to paying salaries. We could go on and on about "equaling the playing field". I won't go there other than to say, keep in mind who, other than the fans, funds a large portion of the NBA... networks and advertising agencies. They don't give a rats about the small market teams. Are you sure the NBA wants the small markets to be able to compete and that it's better for the league? And I am a diehard Jazz fan. My son is named Stockton...