LAST EDITED ON Feb-22-15 AT 06:39AM (MST)[p]>I remember waiting for that info
>to post online....and how disappointed
>I was when it did.
>Killed a bull with good
>palms pushing 40" wide...and the
>tooth aging results said he
>was only 2-1/2 years old.
>
>
>That's just not possible. If it
>weren't for some broken points,
>that bull would have made
>P&Y. Based on photo comparisons,
>I had him at 4-1/2....with
>+/- one year being a
>possibility.
>
>I did break one of the
>teeth getting it out....so they
>only had one tooth to
>examine. Thinking maybe that caused
>a flawed result?
>(i.e. could the software divide the
>data by two?)
Freaks happen my uncle got a 203"whitetail off my dads a few years ago, he got it aged didn't believe the bio so he had it aged by someone else they said the same 3 1/2 year old 203"buck a freak of nature.