>LAST EDITED ON Oct-31-07
>AT 11:37?AM (MST)
>
>all right nutly, tell us O
>wise one, how would roads
>get built, and how would
>our streets b safe?
>Ever see a place with
>crummy roads, bad schools and
>NO infastructure? I know,
>you never would because you
>dot go to those places.
> You know what else,
>if you live in a
>rural area with NO fire
>department, plan on paying a
>hell of a lot more
>for insurance. you seen,
>we should squable over the
>price, but not the reason.
>. . my money
>collectively services my community, in
>turn, there's a community for
>me to make my living
>from. Imagine NO roads,
>or fire, or police, or
>infastructure, in places like that
>there are no people and
>therefore no economy.
>
>Sure there is waste and some
>money is wasted, but I
>sure done know how i'd
>build the school or the
>roads, or maybe you can
>enlighten me. . .
>
>So mr. NO TAXes, how do
>you propose we build roads,
>pay for fire, and police?
> Do you want to
>cover my share? Or,
>maybe YOU want find a
>guy to build a road
>across the rocky mountains, oh
>and maintain it for winter
>travel 9 months per year.
>. . How
>about the schools and the
>buses, you and your NO
>tax buddies going to pay
>to build schools and pick
>my kids up for school?
>
>
>O and a great one because
>most guys that are anti
>tax love to put crooks
>away in prison, only if
>there's NO taxes as you
>would like to see, who
>pays for and runs the
>jail?
>
>I'll await your clever reply .
>. .
LOL Ok let's start with the "wacko" innuendo. You will get no argument from me that I'm a wacko.
Now at your request a reply to your comments regarding my posts.
I can't because it is obvious you didn't read my post.
Your whole argument is based on the assumption that I am advocating "NO TAXes" (I copied and pasted this directly from your post). If you reread my post I clearly state that I am opposed to excessive taxes when there is so much waste going on. I stated that it is estimated we pay .50 cents on the dollar and that is what I am opposed to. Are you telling me that giving half your paycheck to the government is ok? I'll even take this further. The rich and the poor do not pay 50%, it's the working stiffs like me and most of the others on this site. Are you telling me its ok that only the middle class should pay for everyone's "entitlements"?
Like I said reread my post and make your comments based on what I said not what you think.
One more thing. If we weren't building country clubs for prisons and inmates were required to work as part of there sentence it wouldn't cost so much not would it.
