>RELH is spot on. Situations
>like that are extremely quick
>and dynamic. At the
>end of the day, all
>is well that ends well.
> In all likelyhood, if
>he did miss them he
>was probably glad that he
>did. Once you use
>deadly force to defend yourself
>then your legal troubles just
>begin. Make no mistake,
>if armed gunman charged your
>home you are certainly justified
>in my mind, but, strange
>things have happened in similar
>events of the legal aftermath.
> Also, many times a
>robbery like that will go
>down only to have a
>suspect show up at the
>local ER looking like a
>swiss cheese. A handgun
>wound in reality does not
>have the same instant mortality
>effects that Hollywood portrays.
>
>I would however be very interested
>in the rest of the
>story. Looks like they
>knew their target well and
>came in large numbers and
>armed for bear. That
>coupled with the fact that
>this house was set up
>with video on the perimeter,
>and firearms readily available to
>the occupant make me wonder
>if there was not much
>more to the story.
>There had to be a
>substantial incentive for them to
>make such brazen, daylight attempt
>at that house.
>
>
money or drugs....