Interesting....during a presentation on base, attend by the local DA, he said that if two brothers, who hadn't lived together for X years got into a fight, they could each be charged with DV under the law.
>>There is one misdemeanor that will
>>keep you from buying a
>>gun and that is assault
>>against a family member or
>>partner. The way the
>>law reads is you only
>>have to scare your partner
>>verbally and you can get
>>a misdemeanor. I've sold
>>a lot of guns and
>>several buyers got caught on
>>this one.
>
>
>Yup. Domestic assault. Ironically, you
>could do the same thing
>to anyone else and it
>is not a permanent deal
>breaker. Do it to
>anyone you currently or have
>previously shared a residence with
>and it becomes domestic.
>It is also the only
>law I can think of
>that was retroactive meaning after
>the legislation took place in
>the early 90's I believe,
>even a conviction that happened
>prior to the legislation was
>a deal breaker for gun
>ownership.
>
>Also the domestic deal is a
>federal law so it is
>the same in all fifty.
>
>
>
Compromise, hell! ... If freedom is right and tyranny is wrong, why should those who believe in freedom treat it as if it were a roll of bologna to be bartered a slice at a time?