I tend to agree with tman on the issue of scoring. I have met way to many hunters who care way too much about what their animals score. I am a member of fnaws and sci and I "trophy hunt". that is a big word. some hunters are happy with the largest animal they can take on a given hunt, thats me. others cry in their milk if they don't take a B&C animal. Thats crazy.
Any good representation of a species for a particular hunt should be a trophy. People tend to put too much emphasis towards scoring instead of enjoying the hunt, the animal and the mounted trophy. I don't just shoot any animal just because I have a tag, I hunt hard for a big one, but I really don't care what the "score" of it is. Even the late Jack O'Connor talks about the demise of what scoring has done to hunting. You can read it for yourself in the book: Sheep and Sheep hunting,
by O'Connor himself, Chapter 12 The Grand Slam Caper, page 246.
Everyone who thinks scoring is such a BIG deal really ought to read this. He even talks about the Grand Slam Club getting blown out of proportion and it not being what it really should be.
Thats my 2 cents worth.
Enjoy your hunting!