Exactly. Ill take a character every day of the week.I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT SCORE!
UNIQUE BEATS SCORE ANY-DAY!
Amazing How Many People are in to the Score!
Gross is what they are!! ??Gross is for egos and outfitters.
Gross, but big is big. I have never understood the reason for B&C and P&Y giving credit for “air”. Inside spread measurement.
Having a water displacement type system would be awesome. Giving credit for total bone on any given animal.
Volume??So?
Would That Be Known As CUBIC Inches?
Yep I agree DougOnly net if it will "net", otherwise gross.
Many great bucks won't net, but that shouldn't be a reflection on how great the "trophy" actually is.
I use gross score to describe or quantify how 'big' a buck is because most people understand it. Most on this forum would know exactly what a 160" framed typical with cheaters on his G3s would look like.
As far as net, I find it only useful for those wanting to participate in trophy record books. I have nothing against this but have no personal interest at all.-----SS
I agree Butts. I like the idea of the water displacement as a score.Gross, but big is big. I have never understood the reason for B&C and P&Y giving credit for “air”. Inside spread measurement.
Having a water displacement type system would be awesome. Giving credit for total bone on any given animal.
If NET score was the goal, shouldn't they actually be looking for most symmetrical, in which case the 'record' should be any deer with "0" deductions..? Anybody know of any such bucks.?
I love the idea of water displacement, or some method of scoring that gives complete credit to ALL the bone the animal grew.
Gross score even misses the boat to some degree - not that it matters at all to me, but my bull from last year does not get full credit for all of his mass. The mass measurements are the smallest circumferences at the various points. For his H3 (between 3rd and 4th points) measurement, he was like 7 2/8" at the smallest spot if I remember correctly, but that mass pushes up to 9-10" as you get closer to the 4th point. He doesn't get credit for that, and that kinda sucks
Some people like Peperoni pizza and others like sausage. I say to each their own with all of the comments. No one person will ever be right or wrong with their point of view because it's exactly that, what THEY like in a deer. And yes, scores are a way of describing the size of the antlers. I ask guys what their deer scored because I find it fascinating how some animals are bigger than they look (usually due to mass).
I see what you did there. ?Or, we could just change the classification of size based on carcass weight, and to even things out, just slice off a front leg or something and toss it into the garbage so it aligns with the "perfect" hanging carcass weight from a farmed animal...
I don't know exactly what it has to do with your post. But he's saying using a net score is like cutting off large chunks of antler to make the buck "perfect" by someone else's standards.Explain what he did there Jake and how that relates to my post..
I don't know exactly what it has to do with your post. But he's saying using a net score is like cutting off large chunks of antler to make the buck "perfect" by someone else's standards.