A month ago, I didn't even know what a brace height was or what "forgiving" meant. As I understand it, forgiving means not messing with your accuracy too much if you have some minor shooting flaws. I have heard 2 schools of thought of what makes a forgiving bow, and I guess it is a little of both.
First a longer bow tends to be more forgiving probably due to being easier to hold straight vertical.
Second, and this is what I have been told is more important, a decent brace height. The longer the brace height, the more forgiving the bow is. The brace height is essentially the distance between the arrow rest (may not be exactly accurate) and the string when it is not pulled back. Therefore when the sting "releases" the arrow, the further back it is, the easier it is to stablize the arrow and more forgiving it is to an archer who is not perfect with his form. Makes sense to me even though it is all "book knowledge" as I have yet to pick up my new bow and try release shooting for the first time.
That makes it a little hard to decide if one bow is more forgiving than another. For instance, the Outback is 2 inches shorter than the switchback, but it has a slightly longer brace height. I have heard that both bows are pretty forgiving. I have been told to look for at least a 7" brace height.
I did a lot of research and finally settled on a Copper Johns dead Nuts hunter sight. Wanted to get a Spot Hogg, but couldn't see spending that much money on a sight. Heard lots of good things about the dead nuts, and it is only $50-80 depending on the model. I have also heard to get the 0.29 fiberoptics, not the smaller ones for hunting due to the 0.19 pins breaking in brush easier.
I also opted for the whisker bisquit (relatively inexpensive and much lauded as a hunting rest by those who use it) and Gold tip arrows. Lots of good rests and arrows out there though.
txhunter58
venor, ergo sum (I hunt, therefore I am)