OK, I'll stand corrected, but we were talking about two different subjects. Sine you said "ranked", I didn't realize you were talking about RPI, which is different than a team's national ranking. With regard to actual rankings, Fresno State was actually ranked #17 in the nation on June 2nd and 8th on June 10th, by Baseball America. BA does the rankings of the top 25 college teams, and they're considered the gospel when it comes to this stuff. RPI is a whole different animal, as it compares strength of schedule from one team to another, as a way to help measure which teams are stronger since so many have relatively similar records, but are disparate in terms of the quality of the actual teams and the quality of the competition they play against. RPI was conceived as a way of helping to determine which teams are better than others, and is used (abused?) to help the NCAA selection committe determine who gets invited to the dance, i.e. regionals. If it'll help illustrate the difference now, the Bulldogs are ranked #1 in the nation due to winning the college world series, but their RPI is still what it is, and that isn't anywhere near #1.
There are only 64 teams invited to NCAA Regionals, which is why Oregon State didn't get in this year even though they were two time defending national champions. OSU was the #65 team, the first one to miss the cut, but that doesn't refer to their RPI or national ranking, just where the selection committe placed them. Fresno was ranked #17 nationally on June 3rd and #8 on June 10th, and was the #4 seed in the Long Beach regional, which was the toughtest of the 16 regionals this year, in terms of quality of teams competing. RPI is a whole different animal that takes into account not only your record, but the records of the teams you played and some other factors such as wins vs. quality teams or losses to weaker teams to determine who the strongest teams are. RPI factored into why Oregon State missed making a regional, as they lost to some teams with lower RPI late in the season, and the selection committe used that as part of their excuse to invite Arkansas(who finished 9th, I believe, in the SEC) over OSU who comes from the Pac-10, which is a tougher conference despite what all the SEC fans want to believe. Arkansas sucked big time, got their butts kicked in the Stanford regional, where the #4 seed was UC Davis from the Big West Conference, and who clearly was a better team than the 9th place team from the SEC.
We were talking about two different things, you used the term rankings and meant RPI. I do know the difference, which is something the writer with the paper might not, and I'll bet ESPN either referred to RPI or said 89th nationally in terms of RPI. I can't imagine that ESPN would screw up bad enough to confuse rankings with RPI. If you're not totally into baseball you might not realize that rankings and RPI are two different animals. Yeah, they were 89th in RPI but were ranked 8th nationally only a few weeks ago. The WAC isn't considered one of the premier conferences in college baseball, they're a mid-major level conference, and that factored into why FSU had to win the WAC tournament to make it to the regional. Conference winners get in, so the regionals don't take all of the best teams. Some weaker conference winners got in, while teams like OSU that really deserved to be there got left out.
I enjoyed watching the bulldogs win it all. I was in Peoria, Arizona coaching one of my teams in USA Baseball's 16u championships when the final series vs. Georgia was being played. It was a great way to spend my down time watching the dawgs beat the dawgs. Personally, I've got a better Fresno State memory, though. It was them being handed their final regular season loss, at Sacramento State, when my nephew hit a walk off grand slam with two outs and a 1-2 count to give the Hornets a 9-8 win over the Bulldogs in the final weekend of the regular season. That was a very cool moment to watch. At that moment, it didn't matter if they were ranked 89th, 17th, 8th or 1st.