LAST EDITED ON Mar-01-16 AT 03:33AM (MST)[p]>>I believe the 200 tags was
>>50% from resident and 50%
>>from non-resident pools.
>>
>>It would be interesting to know
>>how many more LE tags
>>are available now compared to
>>2006.
>>
>>I was just looking through archives
>>here in the forums going
>>back to 2006 and earlier
>>and it seems it's the
>>same stuff about SFW. Crazy!!!
>>10 years ago expo tags
>>and SFW were a hot
>>topic.
>>
>>Brian Latturner
>>MonsterMuleys.com
>>
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com on Facebook!
>
>And since the hits were the
>same but NR's only got
>~10% of the tags, that
>scheme hurt the NR's far
>more. Ten times as
>bad.
Founder, Zim,
Per Utah Code R676-55-3:
"(3) The number of wildlife expo permits authorized by the Wildlife Board shall be based on:
(c) a percentage of the permits available to non-residents in the annual big game drawings matched by a proportionate number of resident permits."
In other words, 10% non-resident permits (20 permits), 90% resident permits (180 permits).