Deer Hunting after Obama Gun Ban....
- Thread starter kilowatt
- Start date
M
Model_70_Guy
Guest
That's funny... I saw a similar one that catches a different species that uses watermelon for bait.
Longun
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 4,347
It'll never work.....the Boone and Crockett Boys will be whining because of too many broken tines and fractured skulls...so the PETA crew will get on the band wagon and scream for rubber coated head releases and then California Liberals will join in and ban the use of head hold traps......
HunterHarry
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 5,003
Ain't just Cali....
State Trapping Bans
Washington (2000 ballot initiative)?Citizens voted in favor (55%) of banning the use of leghold traps, other body-gripping traps, and snares for recreation and commerce in fur. In May 2003, the governor vetoed a rollback of the ban.
California (1998 ballot initiative)?Voters supported (57%) Proposition 4, which banned the use of leghold traps, other body-gripping traps, and snares for recreation and commerce in fur.
Massachusetts (1996 ballot initiative)?Voters passed (64%) The Wildlife Protection Act, banning the use of leghold traps, other body-gripping traps, and snares for capturing fur-bearing animals.
Colorado (1992 ballot initiative)?Citizens voted in favor (52%) of a constitutional amendment banning the use of leghold, other body-griping traps and snares.
Arizona (1992 ballot initiative)?Voters (58%) enacted a ban on the use of leghold traps, other body-gripping traps, and snares on public land?which makes up 80% of the state.
New Jersey (1986 legislation)?The New Jersey legislature banned both possession and use of leghold traps, making it the most restrictive of the leghold trap bans.
Rhode Island (1977 legislation)?Rhode Island legislators banned the use of the leghold trap to capture any animal.
Florida (1974 regulation)?The Florida Fish and Game Commission enacted a regulation prohibiting the use of any steel or leghold trap where wildlife might be found.
State Trapping Bans
Washington (2000 ballot initiative)?Citizens voted in favor (55%) of banning the use of leghold traps, other body-gripping traps, and snares for recreation and commerce in fur. In May 2003, the governor vetoed a rollback of the ban.
California (1998 ballot initiative)?Voters supported (57%) Proposition 4, which banned the use of leghold traps, other body-gripping traps, and snares for recreation and commerce in fur.
Massachusetts (1996 ballot initiative)?Voters passed (64%) The Wildlife Protection Act, banning the use of leghold traps, other body-gripping traps, and snares for capturing fur-bearing animals.
Colorado (1992 ballot initiative)?Citizens voted in favor (52%) of a constitutional amendment banning the use of leghold, other body-griping traps and snares.
Arizona (1992 ballot initiative)?Voters (58%) enacted a ban on the use of leghold traps, other body-gripping traps, and snares on public land?which makes up 80% of the state.
New Jersey (1986 legislation)?The New Jersey legislature banned both possession and use of leghold traps, making it the most restrictive of the leghold trap bans.
Rhode Island (1977 legislation)?Rhode Island legislators banned the use of the leghold trap to capture any animal.
Florida (1974 regulation)?The Florida Fish and Game Commission enacted a regulation prohibiting the use of any steel or leghold trap where wildlife might be found.
