Cabela?s Desecrating its Own Brand

T

TFinalshot

Guest
Cabela?s Desecrating its Own Brand


By Bill Schneider, 11-22-07

It has taken Cabela?s a long time to move into Montana, but now that iconic retailer of hunting and fishing goods finally has a stake in the sand down in Billings, it might be wondering if it was the right decision.

Cabela?s has become accustomed to being revered by hunters and anglers, but in Montana, many sportsmen and women now have the opposite attitude, disdain--and they're sending back their catalogs with promises never to spend another penny there. When opening a new store, Cabela?s expects the local hunters and anglers who have lusted for years to have a store nearby to more or less knell on the doorstep, but if Cabela?s doesn't stop endorsing the loss of public hunting, the corporate VIPs might see people picketing the Billings store opening with anti-Cabela?s placards.

Here?s the rub. Back in June 2004, Cabela?s went public and is now listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CAB. Such initial public offerings are always accompanied by plans on how to use all the new money for aggressive growth. And sure enough, Cabela?s launched into a major expansion, which primarily involving more and faster store openings.

No problem so far, the more and faster the better as far as I'm concerned, but a small part of that growth plan, a real estate marketing division called Cabela?s Trophy Properties might hurt Cabela?s bottom line and stock performance (already down to about half of its opening price) more than it helps. In Montana, the ruckus over the real estate division has already tarnished the best brand in the business, and it looks like it could get much worse and spread to other states.

I personally don't want to see this happen because I'm one of those who have grown up revering Cabela?s. I'd probably live in a Cabela?s store if they'd let me--at least for a few days until I had to leave to file for bankruptcy. And I bet the company?s brass and shareholders want to prevent damage to their brand even more than I do. If so, they need to act quickly and decisively instead of doing what they're doing right now, which is seriously underestimating the potential of the problem.

The controversy erupted when Cabela?s Trophy Properties opened an office in Montana and started listing what the Montana Wildlife Federation (MWF), the state?s largest group of hunters and anglers, calls ?traditional public hunting properties.? Those listings shot up a warning flare to the MWF?s 7,000 members, and the result was a strongly worded letter from executive director Craig Sharpe going to Dennis Highby, president & CEO of Cabela?s. In the letter, Sharpe warned of a ?strong response? to the real estate marketing, such as mailing back or burning catalogs, unless Cabela?s addressed the group?s concerns and agreed to a meeting to discuss the issues.

A flash point in the controversy was the sale, planned subdivision and eventual closure to public hunting of two large ranches in central Montana by Cabela?s Trophy Properties. ?Is this in line with Cabela?s mission?? Sharpe asked in his letter.

Following Sharpe?s letter and several others sent to Cabela?s by MWF members, two of Montana?s premier outdoor writers, Mike Babcock at the Great Falls Tribune and Mark Henckel of the Billings Gazette wrote detailed articles on the debate. Neither article painted a rosy picture of Cabela?s real estate deals and ended up turning up the heat another notch.

Then, and typical of large corporations that don't really understand damage control, Cabela?s managed to make it worse with its responses. First, Cabela?s spokesperson David Draper implied that this was no big deal and told Montana hunters they shouldn't fret because the properties were selling to sportsmen who are ?probably going to make the land better,? a bonehead statement that Sharpe called ?insulting.?

Throwing more gas on the fire was the corporate response that, in essence, tried to dodge the bullet by saying we aren't really in the real estate business, just the real estate marketing business.

Here?s how that works. Cabela?s doesn't actually buy and sell land, Instead, it licenses its brand to local real estate brokers and allows them to market prime hunting and fishing properties under the banner of Cabela?s Trophy Properties. The brokers pay Cabela?s for the license, probably with a license fee and a slice of the commission on property sales.

Cabela?s third response was the old ?can't we just get along? comeback, which was in the form of an invitation for the MWF board to an exclusive VIP reception at the Billing store opening and agreeing to send out a packet of information to buyers of ?trophy properties? suggesting they do good things for wildlife.

Well, we all hope buyers do good things like leave land open to public hunting and file for a conservation easement preventing future subdivision and that the board members has a jolly time at the reception, but that response doesn't address what concerns Montana hunters (i.e. Cabela?s promoting the loss of public hunting. In fact, the tokenism worsened the problem.

Sorry, Cabela?s, these responses get zero traction. By licensing your name to realtors who use it to market property definitely makes you part of the real estate biz--and not just any real estate biz, but the worst kind.

I doubt anybody has a problem with Cabela?s buying 44 acres down on the edge of Billings and then selling off a chuck or two to Burger King or Day?s Inn. But using a nation?s top hunting and fishing brand to promote the sale, subdivision and closure to public access of prime hunting land is quite a different real estate deal. It is, in fact, exactly opposite of everything Cabela?s stands for, and you'd think the company would be trying to distance itself as far and as fast as possible from it.

Earth to Cabela?s. You?re using your brand to promote the loss of public hunting on private land in large sections of Montana and other sates. This could destroy your brand, and you really don't want to do this.

Getting out of real estate can't be that tough a decision for a company with $2 billon in sales, very little of it from real estate marketing. I perused the annual report and couldn't even find the words ?Cabela?s Trophy Properties,? let alone anything about the millions Cabela?s makes in license fees and commissions--because, of course, this is probably a microscopic part of the giant's revenue.

It has potential, though--potential to cost Cabela?s ten dollars in retail sales for every dollar earned in license fee income.

So, I hope President & CEO Highby sees this column, recognizes the real estate division as a major (but still correctable) mistake, and decides get out of the real estate business faster than he can say it.

If you'd like to support me in encouraging, Cabela?s to rapidly get back on course, here?s a couple of phone numbers that might work, 308-254-5505 and 1-800-237-4444, or you can go to the customer service email page (click here) and send your comments in writing. In the meantime, until we get a better response, keep sending those catalogs back. Cabela?s definitely understands what that means.
 
While I'm all for the free market and free enterprise, Cabelas needs to stick to what they do best. Now that they've become public, that puts a lot of pressure on them to perform for the stockholders. That can be a slippery slope at times.

While the buying and selling of private property is a wonderful thing we as a free society enjoy, I think this can only hurt their image. I'm sure land will sell just fine without the "Cabelas Brand" attatched to it.

Free market works both ways! Cabelas needs to be very aware of who took 'em to the dance.

Eel
 
Interesting comments about what their affiliated broker in Montana is doing. I know a little bit, just enough to be dangerous, about Cabela's Trophy Properties (CTP). I'm in real estate finance and have looked at a company that's considering doing business with CTP. What Cabelas does, is charge a franchise fee, and then annual renewals by geographic area. They also take a percentage of the commissions earned by their brokers. In exchange, they offer what might be the ultmate marketing machine of any real estate brokerage in that they are able to make their listings easily viewable around the world.

The primary client they're marketing to, isn't a developer who'll subdivide the properties and develop them, rather they're marketing to affluent buyers who are looking to purchase recreational properties. They initially began marketing hunting and fishing properties, but their affiliated brokers have many listings of ranches, horse property and other listings that aren't necessarily hunting or fishing properties.

None of this addresses what the new owner may do with regard to allowing or restricting public access. Cabelas certainly has the prospect of unhappy customers with this situation, but the true problem isn't going to go away, regardless of what Cabelas does with their CTP division going forward. Real Estate brokers will still list these properties for sale and buyers will still purchase them and make their own decisions about who to allow or ban from accessing their lands.
 
CAelknuts - This is true but at the same time they need to keep in mind who is keeping them in business (hunters, not realtors). You don't want to make your target market angry at you regardless. They may want to step back and re-think this one. I know I would if I was in their shoes.
 
?None of this addresses what the new owner may do with regard to allowing or restricting public access. Cabelas certainly has the prospect of unhappy customers with this situation, but the true problem isn't going to go away, regardless of what Cabelas does with their CTP division going forward. Real Estate brokers will still list these properties for sale and buyers will still purchase them and make their own decisions about who to allow or ban from accessing their lands.?

Is this anything like Phillip Morris or RJ Reynolds spending a few million dollars warning everyone that their product can kill you & then saying ?Oh, by the way we have a 2 for one special on Dog Turd Silm?s this week?

It's all about marketing & money. No?
RUS
 
It's absolutely all about marketing and money. But when you lose your audience who are you going to market to and who is going to make you money?? It's alot harder to quit addiction than it is to buy your hunting gear from a different store IMO. This may not affect them but it's definitely worth taking serious.
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-29-07 AT 08:40AM (MST)[p]Well sorry guys but I don't share the viewpoint except for CAelknuts. While some of you you think this is wrong the facts are the facts. The properties will be listed and sold by a realtor anyway and if marketing the property through Cabelas puts the property in the hands of a sportsman instead of an anti we are miles ahead. Most anti's aren't using a hunting products company to find their investments. The other fact is the market is driving the issue and like it or not those properties would most likely get sold since the owners realize the timings good in the market. Do you honestly think that any owner would balk at such a thing with realtors waving huge sums of money for these types of properties in their faces. Sorry guys your fight isn't with Cabela's here it's with the owners that wish to sell their properties and last I looked that's their right. You guys should be hooking up with RMEF and other conservation groups showing the owners how beneficial it is for them to put this into a nature conservancy or some other vehicle. If you can find a way to make that work for them you may be able to save some of these lands but bear in mind most were purchased as an investment and if the markets hot they're going to get sold. If it was your investment you'd most likely be doing the same thing unless the money didn't matter than you promote the conservancy angle. Cabela's isn't making anyone sell anything the owners have chosen to market their property forcing Cabela's to not market to sportsmen could result in some fine member of the ASPCA becoming the new buyer and I doubt you'll be hunting until hell freezes over in that case.
 
Nobody said that Cabelas is making anyone sell anything. Simply pointing out that they are playing a role in a transaction that doesn't sit well with some of their own. That's all.
 
I understand that mortgageman but when do we as individuals think it's our business to tell anyone who they have the right to list their property with. Do the individuals in your neighborhood have the right to tell you who you should list your property with? No! The seller chooses who they wish to list their property with based on how they are marketing the property. These guys are simply making Cabela's the fall guy here when the seller could easily choose another company to sell the property. They bought it for an investment not a public hunting preserve and this same sad story is being repeated all over this country every day and Cabela's isn't involved in 99% of those transactions and we aren't picketing those companies! I'll assure you one thing Cabela's has spent more money protecting those peoples right to hunt than just about any retail outlet in America. Until we as sportsmen come up with a vehicle to protect our hunting lands this issue will repeat itself time and time again. It's not Cabela's fault any more than it's yours or mine it's just business.
 
Boskee - You are right in the aspect that they can list their property with whomever they want whenever they want. But I can see the locals point of view. This is a company that advocates hunting on public land, but now they are facilitating the sale of this land so that it can't be hunted anymore by the public. The sale is going to happen one way or another, you are right about that. But they have put themselves in the middle of it and are going to profit off of the sale of something that they are supposedly against. It's not Cabelas fault, the real estate division is selling real estate. But they had to of known that sooner or later there would be some transactions that cause controversy.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom