>Maybe you're right and the great
>impossible is creating safe, quality
>feed for wintering mule deer.
>That's probably why deer aren't
>fed in Wyoming and elk
>are. The science in this
>world just hasn't reached that
>level yet. ha ha ha
>
>Obviously I'm joking because I don't
>believe that at all. I
>believe safe, quality feed can
>be produced and probably already
>exists.
>
>Why they feed elk and not
>deer???? I can think of
>a few reasons just off
>the top of my head.
>The big one might be
>that an elk is worth
>twice as much money to
>the state as a deer,
>and 15+ years ago when
>many elk feeding programs began,
>elk were probably worth 10x
>what a deer was when
>the non-resident demand for deer
>was pretty low.
>Elk are far easier to feed
>too. That's a big one.
>
>
>There's no doubt I believe it
>would be really, really expensive
>to feed deer in the
>winter. But the earlier question
>was,
"if funds were unlimited".
>
>
>Funds are limited. Utah can feed
>deer because we auction off
>a chunk of our best
>tags and have a little
>money to do it. I'm
>not saying that's the way
>it should be, but it
>is just a fact.
>
>So why doesn't Wyoming feed deer?
>There's only a couple bottomline
>reasons.
>1) Feed doesn't exist and can't
>be made to do it.
>
>2) It's financially not worth it
>to them.
>
>I'm sticking with #2 because I
>do believe feed does exist
>that can supplement deer in
>the winter, and if it
>exists, then #2 is all
>that's left. If money were
>unlimited, drones would be hovering
>over the Wyoming winter range
>all day dropping loads of
>yummy winter range grub packed
>in nice little pellets for
>the deer. (They'd probably even
>drop a few blankets for
>the trophy bucks to stay
>extra warm)
>
>Brian Latturner
>MonsterMuleys.com
>
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
>on Facebook!
Wyoming feeds elk because they carry brucelosis which can infect cattle. Feedgrounds keep the two separated. It has absolutely nothing do with maintaining elk populations.