Anybody use G5 Strikers?

[smokinf15]

Anybody out there using them? Looks pretty close to the Montec with the advantage of replacable blades. Almost looks like a copy of the Wac'em Tritons (which I was going to buy), but with a little bit thicker blades. Looking to upgrade to some new cut on contact broadheads this year for my elk hunt (always been a Thunderhead guy). Any experiences with these that you could share would be greatly appreciated.

 

[BigPig]

You are right, they are a stolen design from Wac'em. As such, I'm sure they will do a fine job.

 

[BOHNTR]

Definately a stolen design.....Just another case of a large company bullying a small family owned business. G5 definately disappointed me with this move. However, the patent violation lawsuit is already in the making, so penalties may be applied in the future.

As for the head itself, the design is awesome so it should perform well. However, just know the Strker head is cast out of powdered metal (mim process). The Wac'em is machined from stainless steel which tends to be more durable and precise, IMO.


BOHNTR )))---------->

 

[wapiti73]

It should also be mentioned that the Striker is extremely accurate (the half dozen I've used all spun perfect when attached to the arrow) and group tight. Just as with the Wac'em, they are cut-on-impact and have replaceable blades. However, the blades are remarkably sharp (in fact, they seem to be the sharpest blades out of the package I've come across in almost 20 years of bowhunting, including those made by NAP, Rocky Mountain, and Wac'em). The blades are also 0.03" thick (versus 0.027" for Wac'ems), and the overall cutting diameter is 1 1/8" (versus 1 1/32" for Wac'ems). I don't know much about patent-law, but I do know the Striker is an incredible head and should perform extremely well on all forms of game. I'm planning to use them attached to FMJs this fall for elk and expect great results.

 

[smokinf15]

LAST EDITED ON Jul-07-06 AT 11:51AM (MST)[p]Thanks Bohntr - thats what I needed to know. I'm thinking I'll go with the Wac'ems. But I do like the fact that the blades are a little thicker on the Strikers. Any other thoughts out there to help me make up my mind?

 

[BigPig]

LAST EDITED ON Jul-07-06 AT 01:07PM (MST)[p]LAST EDITED ON Jul-07-06 AT 01:06?PM (MST)



Put it this way. Probably more elk have fallen to a Muzzy in recent years than any other broadhead. Hardly anyone would ever question the strength and durability of the Muzzy head. The Muzzy's blades are .20. The Wac'ems are .07 thicker. That is plenty. I've seen Wac'ems shot through the scapula and into the spine of a wild hog without hardly a nick to the blade. If you want more proof you don't have to look any farther than our own BOHNTR. He's too humble to say it, but the man has killed more animals with a bow than probably everyone on this board combined, including lots of P&Y. If it's good enough for him, that's all the proof I need.

Aside from that, I personally can't patronize a company that steals a winning design, rather than come up with their own, and supports organizations like the World Pro Hunt Tour or whatever that BS G5 was about to get themselves into.

 

[wapiti73]

Shouldn't it also be known that BOHNTR is on Wac'em's Pro Staff?

When looking for a broadhead (especially for large animals like elk), I think any advantage you can put on the end of your arrow should be taken unless it affects your arrow flight. This means cut-on-impact, razor sharp, thick blades, perfect alignment, and a large cutting diameter. I recognize we're talking about subtle differences between the Wac'em and Striker, but these differences may make the difference (no way to predict).

It ultimately boils down to putting two holes in the animal through the chest for the quickest death possible. There are a lot of broadheads that will do this nicely, including Muzzy.

 

[BOHNTR]

Wow?.funny how this discussion turned to me? Of course this is MonsterMuleys and that seems to be the norm of late. Do I shoot for Wac?em? You bet I do. They make a great head that has been tested and proven reliable. So really, it shouldn't be an issue.

Bottom line is this folks, as I stated in my original post, since the design is exactly the same as the Wac?em head, it should perform well. Blade thickness is important, but once you've reach .20 thickness on a replaceable bladed head, it's significance is reduced, IMO. I believe overall STRENGTH of the ferrule is more important once you have established proper blade thickness.

If you like the Striker, shoot them, as the design is awesome. However, the only significant difference is the way the body of the head is produced, as I reported above.

On a personal note, I don't support ANY company that copies designs from the ?average joe? businessman trying to make it in the archery world. Unfortunately, this isn't the first time it's occurred in the archery business and until consumers voice their displeasure with this power tactic used by large companies it will continue. Sad, but true!


BOHNTR )))---------->

 

[BigPig]

w73, Just shoot whatever works for you. You sound like you already have your mind made up. The "best broadhead" arguement will never be solved. You are right, poke two holes in the right place and you'll have a fast kill. If Strikers help you have confidence in your ability to do so, by all means, use them. Personal choice is what makes America a great place.

I drive a Ford, drink Coke and Coors, and chew Copenhagen. You probably drive a Chevy, drink Pepsi and Bud, and chew Skoal. But if you shoot a bow, you're a friend of mine.

 

[wapiti73]

Just a healthy debate - appreciate your guys' thoughts.

 

[smokinf15]

Thanks fellas for all the good info. And good luck to all of you this year with whatever broadhead you've got on the end of your arrow. Think mine will be a Wac'em. Thanks again guys...

 

[Buckrub]

I've been try'in to decide for weeks as to which head I was gonna try. After this post, I think I'll go with the Wac'ems.
Thanks for all the info.


"Good mass & long brow tines"