Castnshoot
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,166
“The sound and steady development of the West depends upon the building up of homes therein.”
Don’t worry, Vance is too smart to piss off the voters in the cities east of the Rockies. He’s got a ton of public land in the east that he can build houses on, where the large populations are now. Same in California.You had not yet posted the article when I asked the question. I’m not sure it’s a bad idea, depending upon which lands might be used. Maybe some BLM land somewhere would fit the bill as stated in Wyoming. I don’t know of much BLM near high population areas where it would be needed the most. Absolutely stay away from National Forests. Can the government be trusted to use such land sparingly and judiciously?
They are too precious, in every State, not just the west, so is printing money to buy votes ie; $25,000 down payment that will simply drive the cost of a home up more through misguided inflationary practices. Government will give you this, and that, and some more, then push higher wages to pay for high costs of living by continually pour more and more unearned cash into the hand of non-productive people. Teaching each new generation “the government” will take care of them.I’m ok with some oil and mineral extraction, things we can’t live with out.
Live stock has also worked out pretty well.
Lumpy, what do you think Utah politicians would do if you open that door?
There is not really a housing problem,, there is a regulation problem. Like you said there is plenty of privet property for development.
My wife and I did residential development (track housing) for years. Nobody ever gave us free land to build on.
“Open” public lands are just too precious to play politics with.
They are too precious, in every State, not just the west, so is printing money to buy votes ie; $25,000 down payment that will simply drive the cost of a home up more through misguided inflationary practices. Government will give you this, and that, and some more, then push higher wages to pay for high costs of living by continually pour more and more unearned cash into the hand of non-productive people. Teaching each new generation “the government” will take care of them.I’m ok with some oil and mineral extraction, things we can’t live with out.
Live stock has also worked out pretty well.
Lumpy, what do you think Utah politicians would do if you open that door?
There is not really a housing problem,, there is a regulation problem. Like you said there is plenty of privet property for development.
My wife and I did residential development (track housing) for years. Nobody ever gave us free land to build on.
“Open” public lands are just too precious to play politics with.