Another day, another shady Peay project

Using heavy machinery to tear down trees leaves a lot of debris that the state needs to remove to prevent fires. Clear-cutting large areas of forest leads to erosion and polluted water supplies. And scientists worry about impacts on a variety of wildlife, not just game.

‘A little thing to help’​

During the 2016 election season, Siaperas began forging political connections. He donated $2,700 to Donald Trump’s presidential bid and $4,800 to the Republican National Committee. His involvement in politics was encouraged by Don Peay, the head of Trump’s Utah campaign.

Peay, 63, a longtime GOP donor, has been a fixture on Utah’s Capitol Hill for nearly three decades, pushing for hunting-related causes. Lawmakers almost always back the bills he champions and block those he opposes. He was impressed by the roller-felling project and would eventually help form a nonprofit connected to Siaperas’ ranch.

They first met and became friends in 1994, when Peay hosted a rally to bolster the state’s mule deer populations. Shortly after, Peay founded Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, a group that raises money for state conservation projects by auctioning off Utah hunting permits at an annual expo.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) The annual Western Hunting and Conservation Expo in Salt Lake City. Hunting licenses auctioned off at the event generate state income.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) The annual Western Hunting and Conservation Expo in Salt Lake City. Hunting licenses auctioned off at the event generate state income.
The expo has raised $80 million for the state since 2001. It attracts celebrities like Wayne LaPierre, the former chief executive of the National Rifle Association, and Donald Trump Jr., an avid hunter who was a keynote speaker in 2016. Two years later, the then-president’s son visited Siaperas’ property, Range Valley Ranch, and shot a bear and a mountain lion nearby.


In 2019, Siaperas reached a new level of business for his tree-clearing enterprise. He spoke on Capitol Hill after a lobbyist connected him to state lawmakers, Peay said. Several legislators visited the ranch to see the results. That year, one of them requested $2 million on Siaperas’ behalf for “strategic and targeted forest fire treatment.”

The next year, Eric Hutchings, a Republican then serving in the state House of Representatives, said he requested $500,000 to support Siaperas’ business. In an interview, Hutchings recalled that lawmakers were worried about the shrinking Great Salt Lake and the threat of wildfire, given record damage a few years before. “As a Legislature, we were like, ‘What do we do?’” he said, adding, “I feel good about having done a little thing to help.”

Lawmakers earmarked another $900,000 in 2021, totaling $3.4 million in allocations over three years.

That process was unusual. Typically, state environmental experts design projects and find suitable contractors, often through open bidding. In this case, lawmakers handpicked someone with little relevant experience and set aside millions of dollars for his business.

Utah has one of the shortest legislative sessions in the nation: 45 days. That makes the appropriations process a rapid-fire event in which part-time lawmakers — many of them developers or real estate investors — and lobbyists have mere minutes to make their case to get budget items funded. There is limited input from scientists and experts, and no opportunity for public feedback.

A tailor-made contract​

Initially, more than $1 million of those funds went to a roller-felling trial. Siaperas leveled 900 acres of woodland on two private ranches starting in 2020. One of them was Preston Nutter Ranch, a 42,000-acre property that abuts his land and is owned by family members behind Hunt Energy, who are worth nearly $25 billion.

With the pilot project complete, he participated in his first competitive bidding process in late 2022, for the clearing of 825 acres in the state reserve of Currant Creek.

Eight contractors submitted bids, ranging from $552,225 to $3.2 million. Siaperas’ estimate came in at $950,000 — almost exactly what state lawmakers had appropriated in 2021.

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Range Valley Ranch last month. When Siaperas bought the ranch, there were too many trees for his liking. “I wanted to see wildlife,” he said.

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Range Valley Ranch last month. When Siaperas bought the ranch, there were too many trees for his liking. “I wanted to see wildlife,” he said.
Days later, the state canceled the process, requiring contractors to take a virtual site visit. The proposal request was reissued in March 2023. This time, the scope of work called for a heavy-duty cable “pulled between two dozers” with a “rotating fulcrum roller to keep the cable elevated roughly 4 ft off the ground.”

Siaperas had patented his fulcrum roller in 2020. His company was the only contractor to submit a bid on the revised proposal.

“It seemed to me that they were custom-tailoring this job just to give it to exactly who they wanted,” said Chris Ivester, whose business was the low bidder in the initial process.

Jamie Barnes, the Utah state forester who oversaw project logistics, said the job could have gone to Siaperas through a sole-source award because he held the patent. State officials decided to have a competitive process anyway.

“I can completely see why people would think that was a rigged bid,” Barnes said. “It was not.” She added that the wide range of previous bids suggested that contractors did not understand the project’s scope.

As it turned out, Siaperas was able to roller-fell only about 10% of the Currant Creek project because the site was too steep for his equipment. The state paid him $240,000, about a quarter of the budget.

The $5 million lodge​

His most recent strategy to obtain state funds for his roller-felling company was through his nonprofit, Atlantis USA Foundation, registered in 2022. The charity’s website says it intends to bring about positive change for veterans “through conservation of our lands and our values.” Last year, Peay, who was then serving on its board, appeared before a legislative appropriations subcommittee requesting funds. Lawmakers appropriated $1 million for Atlantis that year and $700,000 this year.

The state budget description for the funds makes no mention of veterans, however. Instead it directs the money to be spent on restoring aspens to decrease wildfires.

In a conflict-of-interest form filed with the Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, which is overseeing the $1 million from last year, Siaperas disclosed his intention to hire 106 Reforestation to do the work.

Mike Siaperas completed construction of his Atlantis Lodge, a luxury hunting accommodation, last year.
Since 2020, Siaperas has made campaign contributions to Utah’s governor, Spencer Cox ($10,417); attorney general, Sean Reyes ($25,000); and former House speaker, Brad Wilson ($5,000). Cox and Reyes praised Siaperas in a 2023 video promoting his nonprofit that compared his efforts to Charles Lindbergh’s solo flight across the Atlantic.

Last September, Siaperas opened the Atlantis Lodge on his ranch. Ben Cervinski, a representative for Siaperas and the nonprofit, said the lodge has cost more than $5 million so far and remains in “phases of completion.” Veterans could stay at special rates, according to the ranch’s website. But for other guests, the lodge was listed at $2,500 a night per person. Smaller cabins, like the one where Donald Trump Jr. had stayed, and glamping tents went for less. Siaperas planned to turn the ranch into a boutique ski resort in winter and had enlisted high school students to dig private biking trails. The website removed the pricing information after Siaperas briefly spoke to a reporter for The Times and The Tribune.

To date, he has not used the money appropriated to Atlantis for any forestry work, officials said. The state of Utah, his primary client, has not identified any sites where roller felling could be deployed, though the governor’s office paid Atlantis $900,000 after the nonprofit submitted an invoice in June 2023.

In an email to the governor’s office last month, Cervinski asked to return that money.

Still, Siaperas and his ventures have collected at least $1.35 million from the state since 2020 alone.

Patience for such projects appears to be wearing thin among some lawmakers. Legislators are investigating the payments to Siaperas’ ventures, a state auditor confirmed. Rep. Casey Snider, a Republican from Cache County, commissioned an audit of the payments to Peay for wolf lobbying this year.

Though Siaperas once claimed in an interview that he could take any business, even one he knew nothing about, and “make it work,” 106 Reforestation is now rethinking its business strategy.

“If you want to lay blame, it’s at the federal government,” said Peay, because it manages most of the suitable land.

He recalled how he and Siaperas envisioned licensing veteran-owned roller-felling companies in every Western state.

“Every veteran would love to have 106 Reforestation on our federal lands,” Peay said, “running big equipment, being out in nature, getting away from all the chaos and making more water, less fires, better wildlife habitat.”

A spokesperson for the U.S. Forest Service confirmed that the federal agency was not considering any roller-felling projects.

106 Reforestation is now trying to “engage” with private landholder clients instead, according to Cervinski. He said Siaperas welcomed the forthcoming audit of his forestry work.

“Audits can draw attention to many things beyond money received and spent,” Cervinski said. “They can help shed light on bureaucratic logjams that can hinder the work that the funds were intended for.”

6EPPRCX3KNGCNDHQHYVC3RKADM.jpg
 
Elected officials keep giving taxpayer dollars to certain people and groups because there are no checks and balances in a single-party government.

It's also why this Amendment D stuff got through with all the bogus changes to State Law at the last second, such as Public Notice, who writes the description, required timelines, etc...

But, rest assured, not a single incumbent will lose their seat over it.

Same thing with millions in tree projects, lake projects, and BGF funds. Most people don't know about it, and those who do can't stop it.

Same thing with our AG office. Is this three straight leaving office under suspicious circumstances. Yet, the replacement will be elected in November and we'll start over.

In a single-party government, the absolute power corrupts absolutely

Screenshot_20240910_210101_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Elected officials keep giving taxpayer dollars to certain people and groups because there are no checks and balances in a single-party government.

It's also why this Amendment D stuff got through with all the bogus changes to State Law at the last second, such as Public Notice, who writes the description, required timelines, etc...

But, rest assured, not a single incumbent will lose their seat over it.

Same thing with millions in tree projects, lake projects, and BGF funds. Most people don't know about it, and those who do can't stop it.

Same thing with our AG office. Is this three straight leaving office under suspicious circumstances. Yet, the replacement will be elected in November and we'll start over.

In a single-party government, the absolute power corrupts absolutely

True!

But Nobody Listens Anymore!

 
Elected officials keep giving taxpayer dollars to certain people and groups because there are no checks and balances in a single-party government.

It's also why this Amendment D stuff got through with all the bogus changes to State Law at the last second, such as Public Notice, who writes the description, required timelines, etc...

But, rest assured, not a single incumbent will lose their seat over it.

Same thing with millions in tree projects, lake projects, and BGF funds. Most people don't know about it, and those who do can't stop it.

Same thing with our AG office. Is this three straight leaving office under suspicious circumstances. Yet, the replacement will be elected in November and we'll start over.

In a single-party government, the absolute power corrupts absolutely

View attachment 157534
The Lord has spoken.
 
So?

Roller-Felling Gives Them A Bid For The Current Creek Project But After Being Awarded The Job They Claim It's Too Steep To Do The Roller-Felling?

Did Anybody Go Look At The Job/Terrain Before Giving The Bid?
 
It's also why this Amendment D stuff got through with all the bogus changes to State Law at the last second, such as Public Notice, who writes the description, required timelines, etc...

Everyone vote yes on this amendment! Look at Colorado and its wolves if you want a good reason why. (I won’t even bring up California…)
 
Everyone vote yes on this amendment! Look at Colorado and its wolves if you want a good reason why. (I won’t even bring up California…)
I'm honestly shocked you're that naive and shortsighted. We already have Prop 5 (2/3 rule for hunting related initiatives that would prevent something like wolves) and less than a dozen initiatives have passed since 1924. There is also no evidence that "foreign influence" is a problem in our ballot initiatives. Zero. It's never happened. Plus, the state recently made it even more difficult to reach the signature threshold to even get an initiative on the ballot with individual county minimums so an urban area can't overrule the rural areas, like what happened in Colorado.

To give the same legislators that pass our taxpayer money to BGF, sketchy tree projects, and illegal lake projects who also want to sell public land, veto power over the citizens is pure idiocy. It also can't be changed in the future because the legislators can veto THAT initiative if this is passed. Plus, this isn't just a law... It literally amends our Constitution!

They talk like they're worried about special interest money influencing elections, when in reality THEY'RE the ones taking money from special interests. They call them campaign donations.

We can each name a dozen shady things our legislators has done in the last five years. This amendment gives them veto power to keep doing them and there's nothing we can do to stop it. The Supreme Court ruled citizens have the right to reform our government. This Amendment literally votes ourselves out of that right.

I'm virtually speechless that you think something like the fear of a wolf initiative is a reason to do that. Notwithstanding Prop 5, which would prevent it anyway, there's a million other ways this amendment can be used against hunting interests... like with the selling of public land or the veto of gun rights initiative that the legislators don't like, but the citizens do.

This amendment would make it so the citizens can never defend themselves from government overreach directly at the ballot. They'd be forced to try and to do it by voting an incumbent out of office (which almost never happens) and only after the incumbent has passed a law the voters don't want. The voters ability to respond would only be after the legislators passed a horrible law anyway. There's no reason to put ourselves in that position.

You and I have had our differences, but I'm honestly shocked that you fell for that. Wow.
 
Last edited:
I didn’t fall for anything. I’ve always felt ballot initiatives were the worst way to govern because they can’t be debated, tweaked, or modified once they get put out for signatures. Once it’s crafted and put out for signatures, it is yea or nay, nothing else.

I doubt I’d ever sign a ballot initiative and likely wouldn’t even for one I agreed with. This was long before the Supreme Court made them sacrosanct, which I think is wrong as well.

This position I have existed long before 75% of Utah finally discovered we actually have ballot initiatives a couple months ago.

Ballot initiatives are the worst way to govern. We are not a democracy, we are a democratic republic. There is a reason our founding fathers set the government up the way they did. Full democracy was on the table and rightfully rejected. But I love America and the constitution and prefer things to work they way they were intended.
 
I'm honestly shocked you're that naive and shortsighted. We already have Prop 5 (2/3 rule for hunting related initiatives that would prevent something like wolves) and less than a dozen initiatives have passed since 1924. There is also no evidence that "foreign influence" is a problem in our ballot initiatives. Zero. It's never happened. Plus, the state recently made it even more difficult to reach the signature threshold to even get an initiative on the ballot with individual county minimums so an urban area can't overrule the rural areas, like what happened in Colorado.

To give the same legislators that pass our taxpayer money to BGF, sketchy tree projects, and illegal lake projects who also want to sell public land, veto power over the citizens is pure idiocy. It also can't be changed in the future because the legislators can veto THAT initiative if this is passed. Plus, this isn't just a law... It literally amends our Constitution!

They talk like they're worried about special interest money influencing elections, when in reality THEY'RE the ones taking money from special interests. They call them campaign donations.

We can each name a dozen shady things our legislators has done in the last five years. This amendment gives them veto power to keep doing them and there's nothing we can do to stop it. The Supreme Court ruled citizens have the right to reform our government. This Amendment literally votes ourselves out of that right.

I'm virtually speechless that you think something like the fear of a wolf initiative is a reason to do that. Notwithstanding Prop 5, which would prevent it anyway, there's a million other ways this amendment can be used against hunting interests... like with the selling of public land or the veto of gun rights initiative that the legislators don't like, but the citizens do.

This amendment would make it so the citizens can never defend themselves from government overreach directly at the ballot. They'd be forced to try and to do it by voting an incumbent out of office (which almost never happens) and only after the incumbent has passed a law the voters don't want. The voters ability to respond would only be after the legislators passed a horrible law anyway. There's no reason to put ourselves in that position.

You and I have had our differences, but I'm honestly shocked that you fell for that. Wow.

Prop 5 doesn't protect ballot initiatives dictating HOW we hunt. It doesn't dictate WHO can sit on what boards. It doesn't dictate HOW funding is done. It doesn't dictate seasons, lengths, areas, means of take, etc, etc, etc.
 
We're not only a Democratic Republic. We're a state led By The People. The Utah Supreme Court, appointed entirely by Republicans, ruled UNANIMOUSLY that we have the Right to reform our government directly. This Amendment 100% undoes that. It literally changes it Constitution to take rights away from The People.

To see the corruption in politics and then willfully hand all your rights to the politicians is mind-numbingly shocking.

With the protections of Prop 5, it is literally easier for the legislature to put wolves in Utah than it already is for a ballot initiative to do it. This amendment would make it impossible for the voters to overrule the legislature and stop the wolves. Insanity.
 
I get it Grizz. Your fragile and overinflated ego couldn’t possibly allow you to conceive that anyone that disagrees with you is educated and well-versed on a topic, but is only duped or insane.

I’m sure those arguments go over well in your day job.

I believe what I believe. You can disagree. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time you were wrong.
 
Prop 5 doesn't protect ballot initiatives dictating HOW we hunt. It doesn't dictate WHO can sit on what boards. It doesn't dictate HOW funding is done. It doesn't dictate seasons, lengths, areas, means of take, etc, etc, etc.
It requires 2/3 vote for any ballot initiative limiting or prohibiting taking of wildlife or method of take.

Screenshot_20240911_074434_Samsung Internet.jpg


To moveb this to public land, something that IS in contention right now. Let's say the legislature wins the land grab lawsuit and gets federal land. A group of citizens could lead a ballot initiative that requires that all public lands greater than 40 acres can never be sold. This would pass with ~80% approval in Utah as most people want it to remain public, albeit with state control.

The legislature can veto that if Amendment D passes. And we can't undo it. This is WAY bigger than wolves.

The same could be said with the right to possess firearms if we want rights the legislature doesn't want us to have.
 
I get it Grizz. Your fragile and overinflated ego couldn’t possibly allow you to conceive that anyone that disagrees with you is educated and well-versed on a topic, but is only duped or insane.

I’m sure those arguments go over well in your day job.

I believe what I believe. You can disagree. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time you were wrong.
Haha, we all know what your day job is lol. And now you've resorted to personal attacks, that's YOUR ego talking. You just don't like that somebody can call you out for your false arguments and red herrings. You like to believe you're the only one who can make a cogent argument and hate when people can match you blow for blow.

I've said many times to people that we can just agree to disagree, just yesterday to treed, for example. You've not ever taken that position, you just run to personal attacks and your repeated attempts to bully people by bringing up old arguments for years on end.

Like I said, you and I have had our disagreements, but I'm literally shocked that you fell for this one. I also know that it doesn't matter what anybody says or what evidence is put in front of you, your overinflated ego will never allow you to reconsider. So bull moose up all you want, I've seen it before.
 
We're not only a Democratic Republic. We're a state led By The People. The Utah Supreme Court, appointed entirely by Republicans, ruled UNANIMOUSLY that we have the Right to reform our government directly. This Amendment 100% undoes that. It literally changes it Constitution to take rights away from The People.

To see the corruption in politics and then willfully hand all your rights to the politicians is mind-numbingly shocking.

With the protections of Prop 5, it is literally easier for the legislature to put wolves in Utah than it already is for a ballot initiative to do it. This amendment would make it impossible for the voters to overrule the legislature and stop the wolves. Insanity.


Fighting last years battles is naive.

The "game" isn't Colorado. The game is control of the WB boards. Hunters are the minority, we stand to lose in the initiative war.

And yeah, I trust my local state rep a hell of a lot more than national leadership of the humane society.
 
Meh.

My dad can beat up your dad.

But as for Amendment D, everyone vote yes. There is a reason the people shouting the loudest that we have to "let the people decide" are also trying to remove Amendment D from the ballot so the people can't decide.

By their fruits ye shall know them.
 
Meh.

My dad can beat up your dad.

But as for Amendment D, everyone vote yes. There is a reason the people shouting the loudest that we have to "let the people decide" are also trying to remove Amendment D from the ballot so the people can't decide.

By their fruits ye shall know them.
Haha

The people trying to pass Amendment D are trying to NOT let the people decide by gutting the initiative process... The only way the people can directly pass legislation or reform their own government.
 
Haha

The people trying to pass Amendment D are trying to NOT let the people decide by gutting the initiative process... The only way the people can directly pass legislation or reform their own government.

"Not letting them decide by asking them to actually vote on it."

Yep, checks out logically! Keep telling yourself that. Maybe one day you'll actually believe it.

"We trust Utah voters to make good decisions..." Uh...until we don't.

Or in other words, we love the "voice of the people" so long as it perfectly aligns with our left of center ideals and goals.
 
Bearpaw Outfitters

Experience world class hunting for mule deer, elk, cougar, bear, turkey, moose, sheep and more.

Wild West Outfitters

Hunt the big bulls, bucks, bear and cats in southern Utah. Your hunt of a lifetime awaits.

J & J Outfitters

Offering quality fair-chase hunts for trophy mule deer, elk, shiras moose and mountain lions.

Shane Scott Outfitting

Quality trophy hunting in Utah. Offering FREE Utah drawing consultation. Great local guides.

Utah Big Game Outfitters

Specializing in bighorn sheep, mule deer, elk, mountain goat, lions, bears & antelope.

Apex Outfitters

We offer experienced guides who hunt Elk, Mule Deer, Antelope, Sheep, Bison, Goats, Cougar, and Bear.

Urge 2 Hunt

We offer high quality hunts on large private ranches around the state, with landowner vouchers.

Allout Guiding & Outfitting

Offering high quality mule deer, elk, bear, cougar and bison hunts in the Book Cliffs and Henry Mtns.

Lickity Split Outfitters

General season and LE fully guided hunts for mule deer, elk, moose, antelope, lion, turkey, bear and coyotes.

Back
Top Bottom