His message was to his base probably more than Trump & has never been part of the Republican platform as far as I can tell. Nothing about millions of illegals taking jobs from regular working class people or right to work states. He didn't endorse Trump. Good to let him speak I agree but.............?
You are right, it hasn’t been part of the platform in the past. My point was that the Teamsters and the Republican’ts both made a move. A move that’s never been made before. A strategy we haven’t seen from either before. The teamsters clearly have a reason to making that speech and of course it was self serving…… so they have moved……. The Republican’t saw the need to invite that quy to speak, again for self serving reasons on their part.His message was to his base probably more than Trump & has never been part of the Republican platform as far as I can tell. Nothing about millions of illegals taking jobs from regular working class people or right to work states. He didn't endorse Trump. Good to let him speak I agree but.............?
Freedom for everyone has its challenges……. no doubt.I'm totally down for the big tent concept and welcoming as many people as possible, as long as you don't destroy the foundation on which the tent was built. Do we want to become the left in order to win, are we getting the progressive parts of populism instead of the free market populism? At first I was baffled by Amber Rose's appearance (google her it's pretty far out there - who in March praised satanism as "a very rational, logical religion that helps a lot of women get abortions" and she's a self described slut) but thinking about her message more last night I think it was a message of trying to introduce Americans to conservative principles & policies that have otherwise or in the past have avoided taking a look. At least I hope that was her message. Good points 2lumpy!