"how are any of "US" going to find any facts of this episode anywhere but the media"
We have access to the same information, provided the media cites its sources. If they do not, then we should be skeptical or discount it all together. In other words, the media have no access to "facts" that any of the rest of us cannot also reference if we bother to look.
"Biden, the head of the US effort to” weed out corruption” threatened to withhold 6billion in Ukrainian aid unless Shokin was fired."
Of course, Dems claim that it was Shokin who was corrupt and the US, along with its allies wanted him replaced. This appears to be substantiated by the Mueller Report. Of course, the DOJ and others are investigating the accuracy of this report and I expect we will learn more if your assertions are correct. Unfortunately, we may never know what information Dems have concealed or destroyed. But that is a sword that cuts both ways as Dems assert that Republicans have denied investigators information that proves Biden innocent. In the end, every American gets screwed except the politicians and those who profit from their corruption. True conservatives would insist that ALL information be provided to the American people. Any party that withholds information under these circumstances might has conceded guilt.
"Eric Chiramella(spelling) was a cia analyst who Vindman leaked to about the call"
There appears to be no evidence to corroborate this claim.
"Chiramella, then leaked to Schiff"
Those opposed call it a leak, those in favor note that the law protects exactly such communication on the grounds that it prevents corruption. Regardless, it does not address the question. Of the points listed, only one (and that, unsubstantiated) has any bearing on the question of Vindman...