So let me ask you this, would all of your boys been fine sitting in a pop up blind with a crossbow for antelope? It is not about strength but about the ability to simply hunt. I also don't want to discount the importance of youth girls. They are pulled even more by social pressures at age 10 than boys.
A little devils advocate, wouldn't you rather have the option at age 10? Shouldn't a parent be able to decide what activity is right for their child? Why would you advocate for limiting a parents choice? There are several states where any youth old enough to pass hunter safety can hunt.
What would be the down side to lower the age to 10? What fall out or how would it hurt? I am just curious as I want to know what objections there might be... How exactly is having a tag in hand becoming a problem? How does allowing them to have a tag hurt more than forcing them to just tag along?
Question #1:
Would they have been fine? With a cross bow, yes 1 or 2 of them. With out a bipod. The others, no!
Question #2:
In todays society, we want to cancel and change everything just because "MY KID" can so we need to change it for everyone. I am fine with them setting rules and we follow. To turn the question a bit with my oldest son. Since he has always been bigger and stronger than most kids, should it have been legal for him to drive at 14? 13? He could have done it. So should we change the law to let me as a parent have control on that??? Some how we have to draw the line in CEMENT and follow them. Its best for the grand majority.
Question #3:
Down side? Like I said before, we need to draw the line somewhere. We will always want to push the limits. Who's to say that 10 years down the road people will push for 8 year olds???
Having a tag is becoming a problem. If the kids have to have the gun/tag in hand from day one, they are being spoiled IN MY MIND and wont truly enjoy what hunting is. It is not always about the tag and the kill. It is about being in the field with family and/or friends and enjoying the time. Learning. Growing. Teaching. and the list can go on.
And as you said in your last sentence "How does allowing them to have a tag hurt more than forcing them to just tag along?"
If they have a tag.....GREAT! But if they have to be "FORCED" (your words, not mine) they WILL NEVER LIKE HUNTING OR THE OUTDOORS!!!!
We live in a time where as parents, we want our kids to have everything. The best showes, newest mitt, glove, bat, racket........or what ever you want to write down. And along with that we want them to have a tag too. But, being patient and learning the sport of hunting by following dad isnt such a bad thing, is it? Spending time with dad should be fun, not forced. Spending time with brother/sister or aunt/uncle/cousin who has a tag should be fun, right? Not forced?
Thats my thought. I know not everyone will agree with me. Maybe I am a hard a$$ on my kids. But they will earn what they have and they will learn along the way.