So the last goat, I labelled the picture potential thinking he was the best but under my goal. I had him at 20 yards twice at the water hole and the first time he came in I took the photo above and then used the camera to zoom in and really study him. I felt the same, just lacked the mass...The last one is close, but has very low mass up top. Depending on the quality of the unit he might be worth keeping an eye on.
Thanks. The last one was sort of tempting, but when I looked at the pics I really thought he was lacking mass.Nope, when you see a giant you will know it. Mass, mass and more mass???
I hate to be the guy that says never, but no antelope hunter thinks a 91" antelope "didn't look big".If score is important, then I’d keep looking. That said, I enjoy finding a decent one that looks good to my eye and going for it. Some of my favorites are not my best scoring. Also, don’t assume that all big ones look huge. Biggest one I ever saw dead was shot on an average unit in Wyoming and was passed by a couple of other hunters because he didn’t look “big”. Another hunter settled for him and he scored 91”. They can fool you at times.
I get it. How could anyone not realize a 91” buck is a giant? To clarify, I never saw the 91” buck on the hoof, only dead. The hunters involved never thought the 91” antelope was small, just completely underestimated his size by about 8” because of his extreme mass and body size. The two hunters who passed him both shot mid 80” bucks, and all hunters involved were experienced Wyoming residents with a lifetime of hunting antelope under their belt. My point in telling the story originally is that it is often said when judging pronghorn “if it’s big, you’ll know it“, but that may oversimplify the situation. But yeah, probably didn’t articulate that very well.I hate to be the guy that says never, but no antelope hunter thinks a 91" antelope "didn't look big".
We focus on trophy elk, mule deer, antelope and moose hunts and take B&C bucks most years.