320"?

ridgetops · Aug 9, 2020

Any of these 2020 bulls go 320" ?

huntingisfun · Aug 9, 2020

Yes on #3.

Bocephus · Aug 9, 2020

Yes, is #2 a 6x7? I would say 2 and 3 would crack 320

cmbbulldog · Aug 9, 2020

No
right at
over

UtyoteKiller · Aug 9, 2020

2&3 will for sure.

Shadow · Aug 9, 2020

1-Not quite
2-most likely
3-yep

twopointdn · Aug 9, 2020

#1 no
#2 and #3 yes

excavator · Aug 9, 2020

#2 for certain and #3

Servehim · Aug 10, 2020

1.no
2. Yes ,barely the 3rds are nice
3. Yes

billc · Aug 10, 2020

1 my be just shy but I say other both do. I would take a shot at any 3 of them if given the chance

Str8UpLegitHunting · Aug 10, 2020

if any of the 3 would make you happy who cares about score!

hawkbill · Aug 10, 2020

Buckbrush · Aug 10, 2020

Nice pics!

JJhunt · Aug 10, 2020

No on #1
I think the kicker on the right side gets him there on #2
Yes #3

ridgetops · Aug 10, 2020

jasonb22 said:
if any of the 3 would make you happy who cares about score!

So what does that bull score that your pictures with?

billc · Aug 10, 2020

that first bull looks to me to have more mass to me. could just be the angle but horns look thicker and that counts to.

elkboy32 · Aug 10, 2020

#2 has a triple brow tine on his passenger side. That’s pretty cool. Him and #3 will be over 320

goforbroke · Aug 10, 2020

I would say yes to all 3.

#1 - those thirds are awesome and good beam length - 340
#2 - nice extra point on the right giving an extra 10" and again solid thirds - guess 345
#3 looks solid everywhere. good back end Not sure on beam length but 350 possibility

Str8UpLegitHunting · Aug 10, 2020

ridgetops said:
So what does that bull score that your pictures with?

348

GoHigher · Aug 10, 2020

Not a ton of experience on scoring elk, but my biggest bull to date is 327. Using my bull to bench-mark with, I would say all of these bulls are 320 or better. Can't tell on the width with bull #1. The 3rds on bull #2 will help his score. The tops of bull #3 will really help him score.

Gator · Aug 10, 2020

Yes all 3 would pass 320 1# 324 mark 2# 337 3# 349
That would be my humble guesses.

fullthrottle · Aug 10, 2020

1-no way.
2-maybe, long 3rds and an extra help.
3-looks around 330 to me.

MG209 · Aug 11, 2020

Gator said:
Yes all 3 would pass 320 1# 324 mark 2# 337 3# 349
That would be my humble guesses.

I agree with Gator. All 3

Osprey · Aug 12, 2020

I agree with Shadow. 1 not quite, 2 & 3 for sure.

KickrBuk · Aug 12, 2020

Man they all look big to me , I’m terrible at judging bulls , I have a good elk tag that someone told me to hold out for a 350 and I think I’d shoot all of those ?, but I like eating elk so whatever

ridgetops · Aug 12, 2020

KickrBuk said:
Man they all look big to me , I’m terrible at judging bulls , I have a good elk tag that someone told me to hold out for a 350 and I think I’d shoot all of those ?, but I like eating elk so whatever

For some reason 350" is the new norm for wanting to hold out for but really, a 320 bull is a very nice bull.

Lil_Fish · Aug 12, 2020

I would shoot any of those bulls, if given the chance.

BabyYoda · Aug 12, 2020

1= maybe
2&3 = yes their nice thirds will put them at or past 320

huntin50 · Aug 18, 2020

with just one view of each bull my guess.
1. 290-305
2. 325-335
3. 340-350

270winny · Aug 19, 2020

I'm not picky would take any of them if presented the chance.

Robiland · Aug 19, 2020

I think we need to be friends!

#3 is a stud.
#2 is still a great bull
#1 is a solid bull.

Depending on the unit/tag that is the order I'd take them.