Search results

Pacnor.

My mind won't change, leave it as is. I've not drawn some really high odds tags, I've also drawn some really long shot odds tags, and some in between over the past 24 years. I see no reason to change anything.

Never said you were, but you're implying that NR license fees are too high. My suggestion to people that can't afford the NR fees is to hunt on the cheap in the State they live in. NR hunting has never been cheap and never will be cheap.

If money is the issue, that's what cheap resident tags are for.

Not cheaper than Wyoming (doesn't have one) or Montana that's like $15 or something for base hunting. I don't mind paying more, management costs money. Will be well worth it when I finally burn my points, have a pile of them.

No question I've been tough on the wildlife here, and whining NR's.

You mean like the one the ignored regarding NRs drawing super tags? Or the one regarding youth elk regulations? Or the corner crossing tickets that were ripped up? Those types of things?

So how did you determine which BS email was official and which wasn't? The one that supported your preconceived bias was the "official" BS email?

So in other words, the GF is full of crap? You don't believe the email they sent?

Wouldn't have to if it was simply put in regulation...it's why even the GF sent conflicting information, if only obviously.

You posted it earlier. That's THE problem, if the law was as "clear" as you and the GF claim it is, why conflicting emails? Why a round about, get out your oxford dictionary, 400 word explanation on a regulation that doesn't exist? If it was clear in regulation, they could cite it with one...

Wow, with a record like that you must carry an oxford dictionary along with your regulations. Congratulations!

It's amazing how little you think about these topics. Like I said, it's because of these BS vague definitions, laws, and regulations that so many citations and game violation cases end up getting tossed. You read about them over and over and over again. Sad, but if an agency is lazy about...

I know the law and how it works, you seem to struggle with it. The email you received is a BS answer, in particular the part about referring to a definition outside the regulation. That's a sure "winner" for the State in making their "case". Lawyers salivate over that kind of thing. Laffin'...

I would suggest you're pretty well full of crap, but hey, feel free to "think" what you want.

Now nobody can shoot across "water" or a "road"...is there anywhere left to "legally" take a shot? Getting pretty tight on places a hunter can shoot at a game animal these days. Yes, I've shot across two tracks and water, numerous times. In fact killed two elk this year in about 45 seconds...

My computer is busted, I still don't see anything...that sucks.

I only see one email, I have no idea what you're talking about with the second email.

Stay in Utah!

According to one email, I wouldn't be breaking any law.

Which email from the "experts" should I carry in my pocket?

This post didn't age well.

I don't give a chit what the agency contravenes...they don't interpret law and they are not a judge or jury. The reason so many GF tickets are tossed is exactly because of the vagueness and unclear regulations and statute. FFS, the laws on trespass to hunt were so poorly written the WY AG...

They're grossly interpreting vague regulations, which is absolutely NOT their jobs. Their job is to enforce clear statute, which this one clearly is not. Courts and judges interprete law, not some dude scratching vague tickets. It's crazy to me 6th grade civics was this much of a struggle...

Right, and the bullet impacted and killed the elk in the unit I held a tag in. I couldn't give a chit less if the bullet was fired from Mars.

Why wouldn't it be? You shot an animal standing in a unit you had a valid tag for.

Should have added, "about everything Wyoming".

I believe it would be legal.

Same year it burns.

Opinions vary, but I look at aerial photography just about every day at work, so I can visualize what's on the ground pretty easily. Experience matters.

I spend wayyyy too much time on google earth, it's a pretty valuable tool. ONX is pretty good as well.

Some cross jurisdictions on your list, but most are state issues and even more so when it comes to State Trust lands. At some point you're just going to have to realize NRs have no right to anything involving the State Trust assets. Period, end of story. Probably wouldn't hurt to figure out...

Google earth...

You have none of those rights on State Trust Lands. Wildlife is also a State Trust. Get over it. I tell you what would happen if there were no NR tags, Residents would draw a lot more tags.

Tell me what "right" I have as a NR of your state to talk about or try to implement changing any State decisions your Citizens desire there? Why should I be resentful of anything they decide to do? It's not my decision and none of my business.

Yeah, that's the way it works big boy. Wyoming Residents get to decide what systems we use, what allocations we want to give NR, whether we even want to give NR's a single tag. You don't elect our state Senators or Representatives, so no, you don't have much, if any sway with how our state...

Not hypocritical, arrogant or bullying at all, as a Resident of Wyoming, its my/our obligation to make changes that benefit Resident hunters. If those changes happen to help a NR hunter too, great, if not, don't care. I can't and won't help your resentment, that's a you problem to deal with...

But, with Residents outnumbering NR applicants by thousands, there really is not equal chance. Also a good chance that not a single NR will draw a tag. Wyoming guarantee's that NR will draw because NR's have their own set aside of licenses. Your state does not afford NR's that luxury. No, it's...

I sure hope so, not giving NR's in your state their own set aside of tags seems very hypocritical and arrogant. Your state is not guaranteeing NR's will draw a single tag.