gota see this photo

T

TFinalshot

Guest
I might be late on this one, but has anyone seen this shot? Does anyone have the story on it?

44db46310e460c2e.jpg



"Roadless areas, in general, represent some of the best fish and wildlife habitat on public lands. The bad news is that there is nothing positive about a road where fish and wildlife habitat are concerned -- absolutely nothing." (B&C Professor, Jack Ward Thomas, Fair Chase, Fall 2005, p.10).
 
Looks like a helluva photoshop job Tony. If the eagle is just swooping in and hasn't hit the fox yet with its talons, why is the fox doing a back flip with his tail hanging limply over his back. Ears are straight out in a relaxed mode and one would have to think the fox would have its ears pinned if'n he was reacting. There is a small digital "whoops" on the foxes hind leg righ above the foot, it appears. The snow is pretty hardpack around the carcass from all the work by scavengers but the foxes front feet are clipped to make it appear as though they are pushed into the snow. Cool creation but I'm crying B.S. on this one. What do you think?
 
okay, my only thought was that the eagle was a bit too big, ie, the relationship between the size of the kill, the coyote, and the bird seemed kind of odd.



"Roadless areas, in general, represent some of the best fish and wildlife habitat on public lands. The bad news is that there is nothing positive about a road where fish and wildlife habitat are concerned -- absolutely nothing." (B&C Professor, Jack Ward Thomas, Fair Chase, Fall 2005, p.10).
 
Well if youre looking at the tail and the color, you might be correct, however, in nothern montana and alberta I never have seen a redfox that big. They are half that size, even in the winter around here. . .


"Roadless areas, in general, represent some of the best fish and wildlife habitat on public lands. The bad news is that there is nothing positive about a road where fish and wildlife habitat are concerned -- absolutely nothing." (B&C Professor, Jack Ward Thomas, Fair Chase, Fall 2005, p.10).
 
cool, thanks foot! I agree with the fact that it's 100 percent drd. I mean like was said, the dog is completely in the wrong position and the scale if off by orders!

"Roadless areas, in general, represent some of the best fish and wildlife habitat on public lands. The bad news is that there is nothing positive about a road where fish and wildlife habitat are concerned -- absolutely nothing." (B&C Professor, Jack Ward Thomas, Fair Chase, Fall 2005, p.10).
 
Do you guys remember that thread a while back where the mule was flinging the lion around? The position of this cat looks the same as it did in the other pic if my memory serves me correctly.
 
Technology has so complicated the world. Used to be we could see a picture like this and enjoy the fact that wierd things happen. Now we have to question anything we see. Dammit!!!

JB

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
--Benjamin Franklin 1759
 
BS,
Gonna have to start calling you 'Photoshopspy', geeze you've got an eye for picking them out. I first saw this pic and thought 'Wow what a capture' and now I see you are totally right about it being a fake. I still remember when you called out Maniac on a photoshop job. That was some funny $hit. :)
http://sdana.photosite.com/DanasHuntingPics/
 
It's the fox that's too big. i think the "digital error" mentioned before is hair removed by a snare or trap. that fox is dead.
 
Sorry about the multiple posts guys. For some reason it wasn't posting so I tried a couple more times. It took two days for them to appear???????
 
Looks real to me, the position the fox is in looks very natural for the situation, and the pain in his face hard to mimic. Ive seen this happen before, mature Goldens vs coyotes and young deer.

bittersweetmuleymeat
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom